Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 112Cultural Differences and ValuesGlobal and Cross-Cultural ManagementInternational Student and Expatriate Challenges

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Unequal Relationships in High and Low Power Distance Societies: A Comparative Study of Ibtor-Student Role Relations in Britain and China

Spencer-Oatey, Helen·1997·Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology

Abstract

This study investigated people's conceptions of an unequal role relationship in two different types of society: a high power distance society and a low power distance society. The study focuses on the role relationship of tutor and student. British and Chinese tutors and postgraduate students completed a questionnaire that probed their conceptions of degrees of power differential and social distance/closeness in this role relationship. ANOVA results yielded a significant nationality effect for both aspects. Chinese respondents judged the relationship to be closer and to have a greater power differential than did British respondents. Written comments on the questionnaire and interviews with 9 Chinese academics who had experienced both British and Chinese academic environments supported the statistical findings and indicated that there are fundamental ideological differences associated with the differing conceptions. The results are discussed in relation to Western and Asian concepts of leadership and differing perspectives on the compatibility/incompatibility of power and distance/closeness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022022197283005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1177/0013916582141002 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/h0037024 · DOI
  3. Bond, M. H., 1986, The psychology of the Chinese people, 213
  4. Brislin, R. W., 1980, Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 2. Methodology, 389
  5. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085 · DOI
  6. Brown, R., 1960, Style in language, 253
  7. Channell, J., 1990, The learning experiences of overseas student, 63
  8. 10.1177/0022002187018002002 · DOI
  9. Fiske, S. T., 1991, Social cognition
  10. Hawkey, R., 1980, ELT Documents 109-Study modes and academic development of overseas student, 70
  11. 10.1177/0265407584011005 · DOI
  12. Hofstede, G., 1980, Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values
  13. 10.1016/0147-1767(86)90015-5 · DOI
  14. 10.1525/aa.1965.67.3.02a00020 · DOI
  15. Jin, L., 1993, Language and culture, 84
  16. Leary, T., 1957, Interpersonal diagnosis of personality
  17. Leech, G., 1983, Principles of pragmatics
  18. Lonner, W., 1980, The handbook of cross-cultural psychology, 143
  19. Pye, L. W., 1985, Asian power and politics. The cultural dimensions of authority, 10.4159/9780674042414 · DOI
  20. Schwartz, S. H., 1994, Individualism and collectivism Theory, method, and application, 85
  21. Smith, P. B., 1993, Social psychology across cultures. Analysis and perspectives
  22. 10.1037/0022-3514.38.3.359 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/014616727800400101 · DOI
  24. Triandis, H. C., 1994, Culture and social behavior
  25. 10.1037/h0025585 · DOI
  26. Watt, J. C., 1980, ELT Documents 109-Study modes and academic development of overseas student, 38
  27. 10.1515/mult.1993.12.4.387 · DOI
  28. 10.1037/0022-3514.33.4.409 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Spencer-Oatey, H.
Affiliations
University of Luton,
Venue
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Published
1997-05
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
284-302
ISSN
  • 0022-0221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5422
OpenAlex
W2129529453
Cited by
112
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
  • Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
Keywords
power distance, social distance, role relationships, tutor-student relationship, power imbalance, cross-cultural comparison, graduate students, leadership theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.