The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Success Criteria in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the most frequently used criteria to define treatment success in implant dentistry. An electronic MEDLINE/PubMED search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials and prospective studies reporting on outcomes of implant dentistry. Only studies conducted with roughened surface implants and at least five-year follow-up were included. Data were analyzed for success at the implant level, peri-implant soft tissue, prosthetics, and patient satisfaction. Most frequently reported criteria for success at the implant level were mobility, pain, radiolucency, and peri-implant bone loss (> 1.5 mm), and for success at the peri-implant soft-tissue level, suppuration, and bleeding. The criteria for success at the prosthetic level were the occurrence of technical complications/prosthetic maintenance, adequate function, and esthetics during the five-year period. The criteria at patient satisfaction level were discomfort and paresthesia, satisfaction with appearance, and ability to chew/taste. Success in implant dentistry should ideally evaluate a long-term primary outcome of an implant-prosthetic complex as a whole.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buser, D., Weber, H. ‐., & Lang, N. P. (1990) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010105.x · Cited by 724
Self-citation
Cited by
Moraschini, V., Poubel, L. A. D. C., Ferreira, V. F., & Barboza, E. D. S. P. (2015) · International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.023 · Cited by 729
Prevalences of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis: systematic review and meta-analysis
Lee, C.-T., Huang, Y.-W., Zhu, L., & Weltman, R. (2017) · Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.011 · Cited by 538
Pjetursson, B., Asgeirsson, A., Zwahlen, M., & Sailer, I. (2014) · The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants · doi:10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g5.2 · Cited by 358
Multifunctional antimicrobial materials: From rational design to biomedical applications
Duan, S., Wu, R., Xiong, Y.-H., Ren, H.-M., Lei, C., Zhao, Y.-Q., Zhang, X.-Y., & Xu, F.-J. (2022) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100887 · Cited by 257
Messias, A., Karasan, D., Nicolau, P., Pjetursson, B. E., & Guerra, F. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.13616 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Papaspyridakos, P., Chen, C.-J., Singh, M., Weber, H.-P., & Gallucci, G. O.
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-12-08
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 242-248
- ISSN
- 0022-0345 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-0591
- OpenAlex
- W2031806889
- Cited by
- 625
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Success Criteria in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022034511431252
- The paper
- Papaspyridakos, P., Chen, C.-J., Singh, M., Weber, H.-P., & Gallucci, G. O. (2012). Success Criteria in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review. Journal of Dental Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511431252
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
