The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Projections of U.S. Edentulism Prevalence Following 5 Decades of Decline
Open accessAbstract
After decades of decline in prevalence of complete tooth loss (edentulism), the trend continues to be misinterpreted, producing flawed projections and misdirected health goals. We investigated population trends in edentulism among U.S. adults aged ≥15 yr by creating time-series data from 5 national cross-sectional health surveys: 1957-1958 ( n ≈ 100,000 adults), 1971-1975 ( n = 14,655 adults), 1988-1998 ( n = 18,011 adults), 1999-2002 ( n = 12,336 adults), and 2009-2012 ( n = 10,522 adults). Birth cohort analysis was used to isolate age and cohort effects. Geographic and sociodemographic variation in prevalence was investigated with a sixth U.S. survey of 432,519 adults conducted in 2010. Prevalence through 2050 was projected with age-cohort regression models using Monte-Carlo simulation of prediction intervals. Across the 5-decade observation period, edentulism prevalence declined from 18.9% in 1957-1958 (95% confidence limits: 18.4%, 19.4%) to 4.9% in 2009-2012 (95% confidence limits: 4.0%, 5.8%). The most influential determinant of the decline was the passing of generations born before the 1940s, whose rate of edentulism incidence (5%-6% per decade of age) far exceeded later cohorts (1%-3% per decade of age). High-income households experienced a greater relative decline, although a smaller absolute decline, than low-income households. By 2010, edentulism was a rare condition in high-income households, and it had contracted geographically to states with disproportionately high poverty. With the passing of generations born in the mid-20th century, the rate of decline in edentulism is projected to slow, reaching 2.6% (95% prediction limits: 2.1%, 3.1%) by 2050. The continuing decline will be offset only partially by population growth and population aging such that the predicted number of edentulous people in 2050 (8.6 million; 95% prediction limits: 6.8 million, 10.3 million) will be 30% lower than the 12.2 million edentulous people in 2010.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Oral Health Inequalities: Task Group—Implementation and Delivery of Oral Health Strategies
Sheiham, A., Alexander, D., Cohen, L., Marinho, V., Moysés, S., Petersen, P. E., Spencer, J., Watt, R. G., & Weyant, R. (2011) · Advances in Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034511402084 · Cited by 221
Cited by
Kassebaum, N. J., Smith, A. G. C., Bernabé, E., Fleming, T. D., Reynolds, A. E., Vos, T., Murray, C. J. L., Marcenes, W., Collaborators, G. 2. O. H., Abyu, G. Y., et al. (2017) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034517693566 · Cited by 1,981
Global epidemiology of dental caries and severe periodontitis— a comprehensive review
Frencken, J. E., Sharma, P., Stenhouse, L., Green, D., Laverty, D., & Dietrich, T. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.12677 · Cited by 1,079
Kocher, T., König, J., Borgnakke, W. S., Pink, C., & Meisel, P. (2018) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12235 · Cited by 293
The relationship between income and oral health: a critical review
Singh, A., Peres, M. A., & Watt, R. G. (2019) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034519849557 · Cited by 243
Metadata
- Authors
- Slade, G. D., Akinkugbe, A. A., & Sanders, A. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-08-21
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 959-965
- ISSN
- 0022-0345 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-0591
- OpenAlex
- W2140696174
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Projections of U.S. Edentulism Prevalence Following 5 Decades of Decline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022034514546165
- The paper
- Slade, G. D., Akinkugbe, A. A., & Sanders, A. E. (2014). Projections of U.S. Edentulism Prevalence Following 5 Decades of Decline. Journal of Dental Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514546165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.