SDoH Impact on Periodontal Disease Using Machine Learning and Dental Records
Abstract
The impact of social determinants of health (SDoH) on periodontal disease (PD) is critical to study, as a deeper understanding of SDoH offers significant potential to inform policy and help clinicians provide holistic patient care. The use of machine learning (ML) to analyze the association of SDoH with PD provides significant advantages over traditional statistical methods. While statistical approaches are effective for identifying trends, they often struggle with the complexity and unstructured nature of data from dental electronic health records (DEHRs). The objective of this study was to determine the association between PD and SDoH using big data through linked DEHR and census data using ML. We used the records of 89,937 unique patients (754,414 longitudinal records) from the Temple University School of Dentistry who received at least 1 treatment between 2007 and 2023. Patient PD outcomes were categorized based on progression, improvement, or no change, using longitudinal data spanning up to 16 y. We applied ML models, including logistic regression, Gaussian naive Bayes, random forest, and XGBoost, to identify SDoH predictors and their associations with PD. XGBoost demonstrated the best performance with 94% accuracy and high precision, recall, and F1 scores. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were used to provide explainable ML analysis. The leading predictors for PD progression were higher social vulnerability index, poverty, population density, fewer dental of…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One ML analysis of 90,000 dental records identified significant associations between social determinants and periodontal disease that conventional methods frequently miss.
“One ML analysis of 90,000 dental records identified significant associations between social determinants and periodontal disease that conventional methods frequently miss [5].”
ML applied to linked EHR and census data outperforms traditional statistical methods in detecting complex and longitudinal social determinants.
“ML applied to linked EHR and census data outperforms traditional statistical methods in detecting complex and longitudinal social determinants.”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 31 · Cited by 8
- Authors
- Patel, J., Badi, M., Katiyar, R., Ogwo, C., Wiener, R. C., Tiwari, T., Sambamoorthi, U., & Folks, T.
- Affiliations
- Temple University (US)
- West Virginia University (US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- University of North Texas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Patel, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2025-05-04
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1085-1094
- ISSN
- 0022-0345 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-0591
- OpenAlex
- W4410075533
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8
- FWCI
- 7.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Dental Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Dental Research and COVID-19
- Keywords
- social determinants of health, periodontal disease, periodontal disease progression, oral health disparities, Social Vulnerability Index, poverty, tobacco use, comorbidities, travel time, fast food restaurants, XGBoost, SHAP, risk assessment
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Adult, Aged, Dental Records, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Periodontal Diseases, Electronic Health Records, Social Determinants of Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review