Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 623

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Bovine Teeth as Possible Substitutes in the Adhesion Test

Nakamichi, I., Iwaku, M., Fusayama, T.·1983·Journal of Dental Research

Abstract

In order to find a substitute for human teeth in the adhesion test, the adhesive strength to bovine teeth was compared with that to human teeth using five dental cements and two composite resins. The adhesion to enamel and the superficial layer of dentin showed no statistically significant difference between human and bovine teeth, although the mean values were always slightly lower with bovine teeth. Adhesion to bovine dentin decreased considerably with the depth of dentin.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00220345830620101501

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 623

Metadata

Authors
Nakamichi, I., Iwaku, M., & Fusayama, T.
Venue
Journal of Dental Research
Published
1983-10
Volume
62
Issue
10
Pages
1076-1081
ISSN
  • 0022-0345 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-0591
OpenAlex
W2143834005
Cited by
623
References
0
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bovine Teeth as Possible Substitutes in the Adhesion Test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00220345830620101501
The paper
Nakamichi, I., Iwaku, M., & Fusayama, T. (1983). Bovine Teeth as Possible Substitutes in the Adhesion Test. Journal of Dental Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620101501

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.