The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Vulnerability of Unexposed Human Dental Roots to Demineralization
Abstract
Crowns and roots of human molars, the roots from which had not been exposed to the oral environment, were exposed for 0, 3.5, 7, and 14 days to buffer solutions which were undersaturated or supersaturated with respect to hydroxyapatite. Densitometric measurements on contact-microradiograms of transverse sections of the crowns and of the cervical parts of the roots yielded plots of the mineral content as a function of the distance to the outer surface. From these plots, the rate of demineralization was calculated. It was found that the mineral of the roots dissolved even in buffer solutions which were supersaturated with respect to hydroxyapatite. Comparison of the results obtained from the crowns with those from the roots showed that the root hard tissues were more vulnerable to demineralization than was the dental enamel.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, caries progress is faster in dentine than in enamel [4] because dentine has a higher organic matrix percentage [5], higher permeability [6], and smaller crystals with higher carbonate concentration [7], resulting in a higher critical pH for dentine than for enamel demineralization [8–10].”
From Validation of a Cariogenic Biofilm Model to Evaluate the Effect of Fluoride on Enamel and Root Dentine Demineralization (2016) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Armitage, G.C. (1980): Cementum. In: Orban's Oral Histology and Embryology, S.N. Bhaskar, Ed. St. Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company, p. 180.
- Avery, J.K. (1980): Dentin. In: Orban's Oral Histology and Embryology, S.N. Bhaskar, Ed. St. Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company, p. 137.
- 10.1016/0003-9969(82)90057-7 · DOI
- Driessens, F.C.M., 1982, Mineral Aspects of Dentistry
- 10.1016/0003-9969(68)90075-7 · DOI
- 10.1159/000260250 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345860650021301 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9969(64)90015-9 · DOI
- 10.1159/000260694 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9969(60)90049-2 · DOI
- 10.1177/00220345740530020901 · DOI · Paper page
- Nyvad, R., 1982, Int Dent J, 32, 312
- 10.1177/00220345750540040601 · DOI
- Schmidt-Nielsen, B., 1946, Acta Odontol Scand, 7
- 10.1159/000260711 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9969(85)90022-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9969(73)90074-5 · DOI
- 10.1524/zpch.1980.119.1.079 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fernández, C. E., Tenuta, L. M. A., & Cury, J. A. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146478 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoppenbrouwers, P. M. M., Driessens, F. C. M., & Borggreven, J. M. P. M.
- Affiliations
- Dental School, University of Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1986-07
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 955-958
- ISSN
- 0022-0345
- 1544-0591
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review