The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural Aspects of Salivary Glycoproteins
Abstract
The protective functions of saliva are attributed, in part, to its serous and mucous glycoproteins. We have studied, as representative molecules, the proline-rich glycoprotein (PRG) from human parotid saliva and the high (MGI ) and low (MG2) molecular weight mucins from submandibular-sublingual saliva. PRG (38.9 kDa) contains 40% carbohydrate consisting of 6 triantennary N-linked units and a single peptide chain of 231 amino acids, 75% of which = PRO+GLY+GLN. PRG's secondary structure is comprised of 70% random coil (naked regions) and 30% β-turns (glycosylated domains). MGI (>10 3 kDa) contains 15% protein (several disulfide linked subunits), 78% carbohydrate (290 units of 4-16 residues), 7% sulfate, and small amounts of covalently linked fatty acids. MG2 (200-250 kDa) contains 30% protein (single peptide chain), 68% carbohydrate (170 units of 2-7 residues), and 2% sulfate. The major carbohydrate units of MG2 are: NeuAcα2, 3Galβ1, 3GalNAc, Galβ1, 3GalNAc, and Fucα1, 2Galβ1, 3GalNAc. MG1 contains hydrophobic domains, as evidenced by its ability to bind fluorescent hydrophobic probes; MG2 does not. Collectively, the biochemical and biophysical comparisons between MGI and MG2 indicate that these two mucins are structurally different. Several functional properties of MG1, MG2, and PRG have been examined, including their presence in two-hour in vivo enamel pellicle, binding to synthetic hydroxyapatite, lubricating properties, and interactions with oral streptococci. The data presented suggest that these glycoproteins may have multiple functions which are predicated, in part, on their carbohydrate units. The potential significance of the structure-function relationships of these glycoproteins to the oral ecology is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The lubricating activity of human synovial fluids
Swann, D. A., Bloch, K. J., Swindell, D., & Shore, E. (1984) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.1780270511 · Cited by 54
Cited by
Saliva – the defender of the oral cavity
Amerongen, A. N., & Veerman, E. (2002) · Oral Diseases · doi:10.1034/j.1601-0825.2002.1o816.x · Cited by 760
Salivary Proteins: Protective and Diagnostic Value in Cariology?
van Nieuw Amerongen, A., Bolscher, J. G. M., & Veerman, E. C. I. (2004) · Caries Research · doi:10.1159/000077762 · Cited by 473
Bobek, L. A., Tsai, H., Biesbrock, A. R., & Levine, M. J. (1993) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(20)80762-5 · Cited by 458
Self-citationBiochemical Composition of Human Saliva in Relation To Other Mucosal Fluids
Schenkels, L. C. P. M., Veerman, E. C. I., & Nieuw Amerongen, A. V. (1995) · Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine · doi:10.1177/10454411950060020501 · Cited by 369
Saliva-Bacterium Interactions in Oral Microbial Ecology
Scannapieco, F. A. (1994) · Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine · doi:10.1177/10454411940050030201 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Levine, M. J., Reddy, M. S., Tabak, L. A., Loomis, R. E., Bergey, E. J., Jones, P. C., Cohen, R. E., Stinson, M. W., & Al-Hashimi, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1987-02
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 436-441
- ISSN
- 0022-0345 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-0591
- OpenAlex
- W1986080756
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural Aspects of Salivary Glycoproteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00220345870660020901
- The paper
- Levine, M. J., Reddy, M. S., Tabak, L. A., Loomis, R. E., Bergey, E. J., Jones, P. C., Cohen, R. E., Stinson, M. W., & Al-Hashimi, I. (1987). Structural Aspects of Salivary Glycoproteins. Journal of Dental Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660020901
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.