The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical Criteria for the Diagnosis of Salivary Gland Hypofunction
Abstract
There is considerable difficulty in the making of initial clinical decisions as to whether a given patient has salivary gland hypofunction, and hence requires additional salivary gland evaluation. This study identified a set of four clinical measures that, together, successfully predicted the presence or absence of salivary gland hypofunction. The four measures were: dryness of lips, dryness of buccal mucosa, absence of saliva produced by gland palpation, and total DMFT; they were derived from discriminant analysis of data collected from 71 individuals with normal and low salivary flow rates. These measures are proposed as criteria for clinical decision-making, as well as for classification of patients in studies of salivary gland dysfunction syndromes. This study also identified unstimulated whole salivary flow rates of 0.12-0.16 mL/ min as the critical range separating individuals with salivary gland hypofunction from those with normal gland function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Subjective reports of xerostomia and objective measures of salivary gland performance
Fox, P. C., Busch, K. A., & Baum, B. J. (1987) · The Journal of the American Dental Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8177(87)54012-0 · Cited by 615
Cited by
NAVAZESH, M. (1993) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb18343.x · Cited by 1,445
Self-citationXerostomia: Clinical Aspects and Treatment
Cassolato, S. F., & Turnbull, R. S. (2003) · Gerodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1741-2358.2003.00064.x · Cited by 349
Saliva sampling: Methods and devices. An overview
Bellagambi, F. G., Lomonaco, T., Salvo, P., Vivaldi, F., Hangouët, M., Ghimenti, S., Biagini, D., Di Francesco, F., Fuoco, R., & Errachid, A. (2020) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2019.115781 · Cited by 303
Aging‐related changes in quantity and quality of saliva: Where do we stand in our understanding?
Xu, F., Laguna, L., & Sarkar, A. (2019) · Journal of Texture Studies · doi:10.1111/jtxs.12356 · Cited by 293
Prevalence of Subjective Feelings of Dry Mouth in the Elderly
Närhi, T. O. (1994) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/00220345940730010301 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Navazesh, M., Christensen, C., & Brightman, V.
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1363-1369
- ISSN
- 0022-0345 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-0591
- OpenAlex
- W1978468215
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Criteria for the Diagnosis of Salivary Gland Hypofunction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00220345920710070301
- The paper
- Navazesh, M., Christensen, C., & Brightman, V. (1992). Clinical Criteria for the Diagnosis of Salivary Gland Hypofunction. Journal of Dental Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710070301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.