The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Variations in the Social Impact of Oral Conditions Among Older Adults in South Australia, Ontario, and North Carolina
Abstract
Previous studies among older adults have demonstrated that oral disease frequently leads to dysfunction, discomfort, and disability. This study aimed to assess variations in the social impact of oral conditions among six strata of people aged 65 years and older: residents of metropolitan Adelaide and rural Mt Gambier, South Australia; residents of metropolitan Toronto-North York and non-metropolitan Simcoe-Sudbury counties, Ontario, Canada; and blacks and whites in the Piedmont region of North Carolina (NC), United States. Subjects were participants in three oral epidemiological studies of random samples of the elderly populations in the six strata. Some 1,642 participants completed a 49-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) questionnaire which asked about impacts caused by problems with the teeth, mouth, or dentures during the previous 12 months. The percentage of dentate people reporting impacts fairly often or very often was greatest among NC blacks for 41 of the OHIP items. Two summary variables of social impact were used as dependent variables in bivariate and multivariate least-squares regression analyses. Among dentate people, mean levels of social impact were greatest for NC blacks and lowest for NC whites, while people from South Australia and Ontario had intermediate levels of social impact (P < 0.01). Missing teeth, retained root fragments, root-surface decay, periodontal pockets, and problem-motivated dental visits were associated with higher levels of social impact (P < 0.05), although there persisted a two-fold difference in social impact across the six strata after adjustment for those factors. Among edentulous people, there was no statistically significant variation in social impact among strata. The findings suggest that there are social and cultural factors influencing oral health and its social impact, and that those factors differ most between dentate blacks and whites in NC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ilma de Souza Cortes, M., Marcenes, W., & Sheiham, A. (2002) · Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0528.2002.300305.x · Cited by 426
Association of Edentulism and Diet and Nutrition in US Adults
Nowjack-Raymer, R. E., & Sheiham, A. (2003) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/154405910308200209 · Cited by 323
Numbers of natural teeth, diet, and nutritional status in US adults
Nowjack-Raymer, R. E., & Sheiham, A. (2007) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/154405910708601206 · Cited by 212
Oral health-related quality of life in Germany
John, M. T., LeResche, L., Koepsell, T. D., Hujoel, P., Miglioretti, D. L., & Micheelis, W. (2003) · European Journal of Oral Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.0909-8836.2003.00079.x · Cited by 182
Can dental attendance improve quality of life?
Mc Grath, C., & Bedi, R. (2001) · British Dental Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4800944 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Slade, G. D., Spencer, A. J., Locker, D., Hunt, R. J., Strauss, R. P., & Beck, J. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1439-1450
- ISSN
- 0022-0345 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-0591
- OpenAlex
- W1978682211
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variations in the Social Impact of Oral Conditions Among Older Adults in South Australia, Ontario, and North Carolina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00220345960750070301
- The paper
- Slade, G. D., Spencer, A. J., Locker, D., Hunt, R. J., Strauss, R. P., & Beck, J. D. (1996). Variations in the Social Impact of Oral Conditions Among Older Adults in South Australia, Ontario, and North Carolina. Journal of Dental Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750070301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.