Cited by 126

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Incorporation of Caseinoglycomacropeptide and Caseinophosphopeptide into the Salivary Pellicle Inhibits Adherence of Mutans Streptococci

Schüpbach, P., Neeser, J.R., Golliard, M., Rouvet, M., Guggenheim, B.·1996·Journal of Dental Research

Abstract

The protective effects of milk and milk products against dental caries have been demonstrated in many animal studies. We have shown that this effect was mediated by micellar casein or caseinopeptide derivatives. A reduction in the Streptococcus sobrinus population in the oral microbiota of animals fed diets supplemented with these milk components was consistently observed. A possible explanation for these findings is that milk components are incorporated into the salivary pellicle, thereby reducing the adherence of S. sobrinus. This hypothesis was tested in vitro by the incubation of bovine enamel discs with unstimulated saliva. The resulting pellicle was washed and incubated with caseinoglycomacropeptide (CGMP) and/or caseinophosphopeptide (CPP) labeled with 17- and 12-nm gold particles. All samples were prepared for electron microscopy by high-pressure freezing followed by freeze-substitution. It was demonstrated by high-resolution scanning electron microscopy with back-scattered electron imaging, as well as by transmission electron microscopy, that both peptides were incorporated into the pellicle in exchange for albumin, confirming previous findings. This protein was identified with a mouse anti-human serum albumin followed by goat anti-mouse IgG labeled with 25-nm gold particles. Incorporation of CGMP and/or CPP into sali\ arv pellicles reduced the adherence of both S. sobrinus and S. mutans significantly. It is suggested that the calcium-and phosphate-rich micellar casein or caseinopeptides are incorporated into the pellicle. The resulting ecological shifts, together with the increased remineralization potential of this biofilm, may explain its modified cariogenic potential.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00220345960750101101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1093/jn/63.1.107 · DOI
  2. Boekel van Majs, 1994, Netherlnnds Milk & Dairy J, 48, 117
  3. 10.1159/000261581 · DOI
  4. 10.1159/000261377 · DOI
  5. Brandtzaeg P., 1974, Imrnunology, 26, 1101
  6. 10.1128/IAI.18.2.514-523.1977 · DOI
  7. 10.1128/IAI.19.3.846-853.1978 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/00220345610400050301 · DOI
  9. 10.14219/jada.archive.1975.0099 · DOI
  10. 10.3109/00016357009058585 · DOI
  11. 10.1128/IAI.50.2.592-594.1985 · DOI
  12. Gibbons RJ, Spinell DM (1970). Salivary-induced aggregation of plaque bacteria . In: Dental plaques. McHugh WD, editor. Edinburgh: E&S Livingston, pp. 207-215.
  13. 10.1128/IAI.42.2.459-470.1983 · DOI
  14. Guggenheim B., 1994, Caries Res, 28, 182
  15. Guggenheim B., Caries Res
  16. 10.1159/000260931 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/ar.1091490307 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1991.tb01340.x · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1994.tb01211.x · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60554-9 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/25.4.323352 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/sj.bdj.4804020 · DOI
  23. Jenkins GN, 1966, Br Dent J, 120, 472
  24. Jourdian GW, 1971, J Biol Chem, 246, 430, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)62508-6 · DOI
  25. 10.1017/S0022029900029125 · DOI
  26. 10.1177/00220345580370060801 · DOI
  27. Krobicka A., 1986, J Dent Res, 65, 200
  28. Lie T., 1977, Scand J Dent Res, 85, 217
  29. 10.1083/jcb.9.2.409 · DOI
  30. 10.1159/000260263 · DOI
  31. 10.1128/IAI.41.2.848-850.1983 · DOI
  32. Mellanby M. (1929). Diet and the teeth: An experimental study. Part I. Dental structure in dogs. Special report series No. 140, Medical Research Council. London: His Majesty's Stationery Office, pp. 1-308.
  33. Mellanby M. (1930). Diet and the teeth: An experimental study. Part II. A. Diet and dental disease. B. Diet and dental structure in mammals other than the dog. Special report series No. 153, Medical Research Council. London: His Majesty's Stationery Office , pp. 162-278.
  34. 10.1007/978-3-642-72815-0_8 · DOI
  35. Muller M., 1980, Proc 7th Eur Congr Electron Microsc, 2, 720
  36. Mundorff-Shrestha SA, 1993, Caries Res, 28, 106, 10.1159/000261630 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/j.1399-302X.1994.tb00058.x · DOI
  38. Nyvad B., Fejerskov O (1984). Experimentally induced changes in ultrastructure of pellicle on enamel in vivo. In: Bacterial adhesion and preventive dentistry. Ten Cate JM, Leach SA, editors. Oxford: IRL Press Ltd, pp. 143-151.
  39. 10.1051/lait:198911 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/0003-9969(66)90135-X · DOI
  41. 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208 · DOI
  42. 10.1177/00220345870660060601 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/0003-9969(84)90093-1 · DOI
  44. Reynolds EC, 1979, Aust J Dairy Tech, 9, 175
  45. 10.1159/000261050 · DOI
  46. 10.1177/00220345950740060601 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/0927-7765(94)80064-2 · DOI
  48. 10.1177/00220345840630061601 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/sj.bdj.4803614 · DOI
  50. Schmid R., 1993, J Dent Res, 72, 394
  51. 10.1093/jn/67.2.253 · DOI
  52. 10.1159/000260944 · DOI
  53. 10.1177/00220345870660010801 · DOI
  54. 10.1128/IAI.60.8.3268-3277.1992 · DOI
  55. 10.1128/IAI.60.8.3278-3286.1992 · DOI
  56. Studer D., 1989, Scanning Microscopy (Suppl, 3, 253
  57. 10.1016/0003-9969(94)90059-0 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/0005-2795(80)90257-3 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/0003-9969(66)90117-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 126

Metadata

Authors
Schüpbach, P., Neeser, J. R., Golliard, M., Rouvet, M., & Guggenheim, B.
Venue
Journal of Dental Research
Published
1996-10
Volume
75
Issue
10
Pages
1779-1788
ISSN
  • 0022-0345
  • 1544-0591
Cited by
126
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review