The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contribution of Jaw Muscle Size and Craniofacial Morphology to Human Bite Force Magnitude
Abstract
The existence of an interaction among bite force magnitude, jaw muscle size (e.g., cross-sectional area, thickness), and craniofacial morphology is widely accepted. Bite force magnitude depends on the size of the jaw muscles and the lever arm lengths of bite force and muscle forces, which in turn are dictated by craniofacial morphology. In this study, the relative contributions of craniofacial morphology and jaw muscle thickness to the bite force magnitude were studied. In 121 adult individuals, both magnitude and direction of the maximal voluntary bite force were registered. Craniofacial dimensions were measured by anthropometries and from lateral radiographs. The thicknesses of the masseter, temporal, and digastric muscles were registered by ultrasonography. After a factor analysis was applied to the anthropometric and cephalometric dimensions, the correlation between bite force magnitude, on the one hand, and the "craniofacial factors" and jaw muscle thicknesses, on the other, was assessed by stepwise multiple regression. Fifty-eight percent of the bite force variance could be explained. From the jaw muscles, only the thickness of the masseter muscle correlated significantly with bite force magnitude. Bite force magnitude also correlated significantly positively with vertical and transverse facial dimensions and the inclination of the midface, and significantly negatively with mandibular inclination and occlusal plane inclination. The contribution of the masseter muscle to the variation in bite force magnitude was higher than that of the craniofacial factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Occlusal Forces in Normal- and Long-face Adults
Proffit, W. R., Fields, H. W., & Nixon, W. L. (1983) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/00220345830620051201 · Cited by 478
Muscle fibre type distribution, muscle cross‐sectional area and maximal voluntary strength in humans
SCHANTZ, P., RANDALL‐FOX, E., HUTCHISON, W., TYDÉN, A., & ÅSTRAND, P. ‐. (1983) · Acta Physiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1748-1716.1983.tb07200.x · Cited by 368
Koolstra, J. H., van Eijden, T. M. G. J., Weijs, W. A., & Naeije, M. (1988) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(88)90219-9 · Cited by 366
Self-citationBakke, M., Tuxetv, A., Vilmann, P., Jensen, B. R., Vilmann, A., & Toft, M. (1992) · European Journal of Oral Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.1992.tb01734.x · Cited by 264
Forces acting on the mandible during bilateral static bite at different bite force levels
Pruim, G. J., de Jongh, H. J., & ten Bosch, J. J. (1980) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(80)90237-7 · Cited by 245
Masseter muscle thickness in growing individuals and its relation to facial morphology
Raadsheer, M. C., Kiliaridis, S., Van Eijden, T. M. G. J., Van Ginkel, F. C., & Prahl-Andersen, B. (1996) · Archives of Oral Biology · doi:10.1016/0003-9969(95)00136-0 · Cited by 229
Self-citationBiomechanics of differences in lower facial height
Throckmorton, G. S., Finn, R. A., & Bell, W. H. (1980) · American Journal of Orthodontics · doi:10.1016/0002-9416(80)90106-2 · Cited by 220
Correlations between the cross‐sectional area of the jaw muscles and craniofacial size and shape
Weijs, W. A., & Hillen, B. (1986) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330700403 · Cited by 217
Hannam, A. G., & Wood, W. W. (1989) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330800404 · Cited by 209
Manns, A., Miralles, R., & Palazzi, C. (1979) · The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · doi:10.1016/0022-3913(79)90200-2 · Cited by 192
Cited by
Determinants of masticatory performance in dentate adults
Hatch, J. P., Shinkai, R. S. A., Sakai, S., Rugh, J. D., & Paunovich, E. D. (2001) · Archives of Oral Biology · doi:10.1016/s0003-9969(01)00023-1 · Cited by 502
Bite force production capability and efficiency in Neandertals and modern humans
O'Connor, C. F., Franciscus, R. G., & Holton, N. E. (2005) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20025 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Raadsheer, M. C., van Eijden, T. M. G. J., van Ginkel, F. C., & Prahl-Andersen, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Dental Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-42
- ISSN
- 0022-0345 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-0591
- OpenAlex
- W2124217169
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 12.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of Jaw Muscle Size and Craniofacial Morphology to Human Bite Force Magnitude. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00220345990780010301
- The paper
- Raadsheer, M. C., van Eijden, T. M. G. J., van Ginkel, F. C., & Prahl-Andersen, B. (1999). Contribution of Jaw Muscle Size and Craniofacial Morphology to Human Bite Force Magnitude. Journal of Dental Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780010301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.