The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Embedding of Bone Samples in Methylmethacrylate: An Improved Method Suitable for Bone Histomorphometry, Histochemistry, and Immunohistochemistry
Open accessAbstract
Methylmethacrylate (MMA) embedding of undecalcified bone biopsies is a technique widely used for bone histomorphometry. However, conventional MMA embedding causes almost complete loss of enzyme activity and protein antigenicity in the tissues. Recently, an MMA embedding technique has been reported that preserves enzyme activity and antigenic determinants in bone tissue. We describe here a modification of this embedding method. For our modified MMA embedding process, commercially available methacrylates can be used without purification, and the histologic quality of bone sections is comparable to that of conventionally MMA-embedded bone specimens. The technique reported here can be employed for embedding of larger bone samples and is suitable for histochemical and immunohistological applications as well as for routine bone histomorphometry. By addition of methylbenzoate during infiltration and polymerization of the plastic, the antigenicity of the tissue was improved. As applications of this novel technique, demonstration of alkaline phosphatase and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase as well as positive labeling of Kupffer cells and osteoclasts with the monoclonal antibody ED1 in sections of liver, tibiae, and vertebrae of 3-month-old rats was demonstrated. The method described here might be useful for the inclusion of histochemical and immunohistological methods into bone histomorphometry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parfitt, A. M. (1994) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.240550303 · Cited by 1,001
The expression of osteoclast markers on foreign body giant cells
Kadoya, Y., Al-Saffar, N., Kobayashi, A., & Revell, P. A. (1994) · Bone and Mineral · doi:10.1016/s0169-6009(08)80211-5 · Cited by 87
Cited by
Hauge, E. M., Qvesel, D., Eriksen, E. F., Mosekilde, L., & Melsen, F. (2001) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.9.1575 · Cited by 397
Estrogen Regulates Bone Turnover by Targeting RANKL Expression in Bone Lining Cells
Streicher, C., Heyny, A., Andrukhova, O., Haigl, B., Slavic, S., Schüler, C., Kollmann, K., Kantner, I., Sexl, V., Kleiter, M., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06614-0 · Cited by 251
Self-citationNyman, J. S., Even, J. L., Jo, C.-H., Herbert, E. G., Murry, M. R., Cockrell, G. E., Wahl, E. C., Bunn, R. C., Lumpkin, C. K., Fowlkes, J. L., et al. (2011) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2010.12.016 · Cited by 112
Ulrich-Vinther, M., & Andreassen, T. T. (2005) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/s00223-004-0126-9 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Erben, R. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 307-313
- ISSN
- 0022-1554 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-5044
- OpenAlex
- W2078888308
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Embedding of Bone Samples in Methylmethacrylate: An Improved Method Suitable for Bone Histomorphometry, Histochemistry, and Immunohistochemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002215549704500215
- The paper
- Erben, R. G. (1997). Embedding of Bone Samples in Methylmethacrylate: An Improved Method Suitable for Bone Histomorphometry, Histochemistry, and Immunohistochemistry. Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1177/002215549704500215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.