The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is Rational-Emotive Therapy Stoical, Humanistic, or Spiritual?
Abstract
This reply to Finley (1979), who contends that rational-emotive therapy is neither stoical, humanistic, nor spiritual attempts to distinguish between Finley's valid and invalid perceptions and conceptions about rational-emotive therapy (RET).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Stoicism, which originated in ancient Greece and influenced the early development of cognitive and behaviour therapy (CBT)”
From Stoicism and death acceptance: integrating Stoic philosophy in cognitive behaviour therapy for death anxiety (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
In the citing paper
“Ellis, in his original works outlining and defending REBT, goes so far as to directly quote Epictetus, stating that Stoic tenants underpinned his theories and practice [24].”
From Stoicism and death acceptance: integrating Stoic philosophy in cognitive behaviour therapy for death anxiety (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
In the citing paper
“The fact that Stoic philosophy is built into the foundations of CBT is rarely recognised by practitioners.”
From Stoicism and death acceptance: integrating Stoic philosophy in cognitive behaviour therapy for death anxiety (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
In the citing paper
“an adaptation of a philosophy to clinical practice does not require practitioners to adhere to each and every tenant of them, with Ellis [24] also clarifying that there are aspects of Stoicism which were not included or directly relevant to his purposes.”
From Stoicism and death acceptance: integrating Stoic philosophy in cognitive behaviour therapy for death anxiety (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cites
Humanistic Psychotherapy: The Rational-Emotive Approach
Ellis, A., & Sagarin, E. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 592
Self-citation(2015) · doi:10.4337/9781784711337.00007 · Cited by 550
Ellis, A. (1969) · Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy · doi:10.1007/bf02110062 · Cited by 304
Self-citationThe Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell
Russell, B. (2009) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203875391 · Cited by 258
Ellis, A. (1977) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/001100007700700102 · Cited by 152
Self-citationThe Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell, 1903-1959
Russell, B., Egner, R. E., & Denonn, L. E. (1961) · Cited by 125
Brief psychotherapy in medical and health practice
Ellis, A., & Abrahms, E. R. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 44
Self-citationBrief psychotherapy in medical and health practice
Watts, F. (1979) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(79)90110-4 · Cited by 44
Armstrong, L. M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_996 · Cited by 2
The Spiritual Poverty of Rational-Emotive Therapy
Finley, R. D. (1979) · Journal of Humanistic Psychology · doi:10.1177/002216787901900313 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Epictetus., 1899, The works of Epictetus
- Popper, K.R., 1972, Objective knowledge
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Menzies, R. E., & Whittle, L. F. (2022) · Discover Psychology · doi:10.1007/s44202-022-00023-9 · Cited by 14
“Ellis, in his original works outlining and defending REBT, goes so far as to directly quote Epictetus, stating that Stoic tenants underpinned his theories and practice [24].”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellis, A.
- Corresponding author
- Ellis, Albert
- Venue
- Journal of Humanistic Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1979-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 89-92
- ISSN
- 0022-1678 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-650X
- OpenAlex
- W2148684110
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Humanistic Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Keywords
- rational emotive behavior therapy, Stoicism, humanistic psychology, spirituality, treatment options, psychotherapy theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
