The Swedish WAIS-R Factor Structure and Cognitive Profiles for Adults with Dyslexia
Abstract
Factor analysis of the Swedish version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised (WAIS-R) on a group of 88 adult individuals with dyslexia showed a three-factor structure with a verbal comprehension (VC) factor, a perceptual organization (PO) factor, and a freedom from distractibility (FD) factor. The results of this factor analysis support earlier findings from factor analyses of adults in the original U.S. normative sample and in different clinical groups. The profile of scores for the sample of individuals with dyslexia showed the expected pattern, with PO highest and FD lowest. The predicted pattern was also observed using Bannatyne's recategorization of WAIS-R subtests. As has been true for other typical and exceptional samples, women scored significantly higher than men on the Digit Symbol subtest. Related to this gender difference, Digit Symbol scores proved to be sensitive to problems associated with dyslexia only for men with dyslexia. Also, education level was shown to be related to verbal (V)—performance (P) IQ discrepancy, with larger P > V differences observed for participants with fewer years of formal schooling. Regardless of these gender and education differences, the characteristic factor score and Bannatyne patterns were identified for both men and women and for three different subsamples categorized by educational level.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Barkley, R. A. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.121.1.65 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Genome-scan for IQ discrepancy in autism: evidence for loci on chromosomes 10 and 16
Chapman, N. H., Estes, A., Munson, J., Bernier, R., Webb, S. J., Rothstein, J. H., Minshew, N. J., Dawson, G., Schellenberg, G. D., & Wijsman, E. M. (2011) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-010-0899-z · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Moura, O., Costa, P., & Simões, M. R. (2019) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.2018.1561410 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alm, J., & Kaufman, A. S.
- Affiliations
- Swedish Institute for Psychological Assessment, jan.alm@psyk. uu.se
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Venue
- Journal of Learning Disabilities
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 321-333
- ISSN
- 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4780
- OpenAlex
- W2146782205
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- dyslexia, WAIS-R, factor structure, cognitive profile, verbal comprehension, perceptual organization, distractibility, gender differences, educational attainment, performance IQ, Swedish adults
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Attention, Cognition Disorders, Dyslexia, Educational Status, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Sex Factors, Sweden
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review