Cited by 16Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyReading and Literacy DevelopmentCognitive Abilities and Testing

The Swedish WAIS-R Factor Structure and Cognitive Profiles for Adults with Dyslexia

Alm, Jan, Kaufman, Alan S.·2002·Journal of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

Factor analysis of the Swedish version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised (WAIS-R) on a group of 88 adult individuals with dyslexia showed a three-factor structure with a verbal comprehension (VC) factor, a perceptual organization (PO) factor, and a freedom from distractibility (FD) factor. The results of this factor analysis support earlier findings from factor analyses of adults in the original U.S. normative sample and in different clinical groups. The profile of scores for the sample of individuals with dyslexia showed the expected pattern, with PO highest and FD lowest. The predicted pattern was also observed using Bannatyne's recategorization of WAIS-R subtests. As has been true for other typical and exceptional samples, women scored significantly higher than men on the Digit Symbol subtest. Related to this gender difference, Digit Symbol scores proved to be sensitive to problems associated with dyslexia only for men with dyslexia. Also, education level was shown to be related to verbal (V)—performance (P) IQ discrepancy, with larger P > V differences observed for participants with fewer years of formal schooling. Regardless of these gender and education differences, the characteristic factor score and Bannatyne patterns were identified for both men and women and for three different subsamples categorized by educational level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00222194020350040301

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alm, J., & Kaufman, A. S.
Affiliations
  • Swedish Institute for Psychological Assessment, jan.alm@psyk. uu.se
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Published
2002-07
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
321-333
ISSN
  • 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4780
OpenAlex
W2146782205
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
dyslexia, WAIS-R, factor structure, cognitive profile, verbal comprehension, perceptual organization, distractibility, gender differences, educational attainment, performance IQ, Swedish adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Attention, Cognition Disorders, Dyslexia, Educational Status, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Sex Factors, Sweden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review