Toward Integrative Reading Science: The Direct and Indirect Effects Model of Reading
Abstract
The authors propose an integrative theoretical model of reading called the direct and indirect effects model of reading (DIER) that builds on and extends several prominent theoretical models of reading. According to DIER, the following skills and knowledge are involved in reading comprehension: word reading, listening comprehension, text reading fluency, background knowledge (content knowledge and discourse knowledge), reading affect or socioemotions, higher order cognitions and regulation (e.g., inference, perspective taking, reasoning, and comprehension monitoring), vocabulary, grammatical (morphosyntactic and syntactic) knowledge, phonology, morphology, orthography, and domain-general cognitions (e.g., working memory and attentional control). Importantly, DIER also describes the nature of structural relations-component skills are hypothesized to have (a) hierarchical relations; (b) dynamic (or differential) relations as a function of text, activity (including assessment), and development; and (c) interactive relations. The authors then examined the hierarchical relations hypothesis by comparing a flat or direct relations model with hierarchical relations (or direct and indirect effects) models. Structural equation model results from 201 Korean-speaking first graders supported the hierarchical relations hypothesis and revealed multichanneled direct and indirect effects of component skills. These results are discussed in light of DIER, including instructional and assessment…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Morphological awareness is a semantic component skill of word reading and affects vocabulary and syntactic skills in listening comprehension, which in turn contributes to reading comprehension.
“According to the direct and indirect effects model of reading (Kim, 2020; Kim et al., 2020), morphological awareness is a semantic component skill of word reading and affects vocabulary and syntactic skills in listening comprehension, which in turn contributes to reading comprehension.”
From Do word-level skills show cross-linguistic transfer and predict bilingual reading? (2026) · cites this paper as Kim, 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 138 · Cited by 166
- Authors
- Kim, Y.-S. G.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Young-Suk Grace
- ORCID
- Kim, Young-Suk Grace
- Venue
- Journal of Learning Disabilities
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-03-03
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 469-491
- ISSN
- 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4780
- OpenAlex
- W3010332646
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 138
- Citations by year
- 2026: 48 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 21.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Grantee Submission
- Funders
- National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2013S1A3A2054928)
- Institute of Education Sciences (R305A130131, R305A180055)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- reading comprehension, component skills, reading development, reading difficulties, first grade students, Korean-speaking children, vocabulary knowledge, prior knowledge, working memory, attentional control, inference, perspective taking, comprehension monitoring, reading fluency, listening comprehension, phonology, morphology (linguistics), orthography, reading instruction, reading assessment
- MeSH terms
- Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Linguistics, Male, Models, Psychological, Reading, Thinking, Models, Statistical, Comprehension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review