Cited by 166Reading and Literacy DevelopmentSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLanguage Development and Disorders

Toward Integrative Reading Science: The Direct and Indirect Effects Model of Reading

Kim, Young-Suk Grace·2020·Journal of Learning Disabilities

Abstract

The authors propose an integrative theoretical model of reading called the direct and indirect effects model of reading (DIER) that builds on and extends several prominent theoretical models of reading. According to DIER, the following skills and knowledge are involved in reading comprehension: word reading, listening comprehension, text reading fluency, background knowledge (content knowledge and discourse knowledge), reading affect or socioemotions, higher order cognitions and regulation (e.g., inference, perspective taking, reasoning, and comprehension monitoring), vocabulary, grammatical (morphosyntactic and syntactic) knowledge, phonology, morphology, orthography, and domain-general cognitions (e.g., working memory and attentional control). Importantly, DIER also describes the nature of structural relations-component skills are hypothesized to have (a) hierarchical relations; (b) dynamic (or differential) relations as a function of text, activity (including assessment), and development; and (c) interactive relations. The authors then examined the hierarchical relations hypothesis by comparing a flat or direct relations model with hierarchical relations (or direct and indirect effects) models. Structural equation model results from 201 Korean-speaking first graders supported the hierarchical relations hypothesis and revealed multichanneled direct and indirect effects of component skills. These results are discussed in light of DIER, including instructional and assessment…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022219420908239

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Morphological awareness is a semantic component skill of word reading and affects vocabulary and syntactic skills in listening comprehension, which in turn contributes to reading comprehension.

    “According to the direct and indirect effects model of reading (Kim, 2020; Kim et al., 2020), morphological awareness is a semantic component skill of word reading and affects vocabulary and syntactic skills in listening comprehension, which in turn contributes to reading comprehension.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 138 · Cited by 166

Authors
Kim, Y.-S. G.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Young-Suk Grace
Venue
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Published
2020-03-03
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
469-491
ISSN
  • 0022-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4780
OpenAlex
W3010332646
Cited by
166
References
138
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 4
FWCI
21.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Learning Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Grantee Submission
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2013S1A3A2054928)
  • Institute of Education Sciences (R305A130131, R305A180055)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
reading comprehension, component skills, reading development, reading difficulties, first grade students, Korean-speaking children, vocabulary knowledge, prior knowledge, working memory, attentional control, inference, perspective taking, comprehension monitoring, reading fluency, listening comprehension, phonology, morphology (linguistics), orthography, reading instruction, reading assessment
MeSH terms
Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Linguistics, Male, Models, Psychological, Reading, Thinking, Models, Statistical, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review