Cross-National Analysis of Diffusion of Consumer Durable Goods in Pacific Rim Countries
Abstract
The Bass new product growth model is used for cross-national analysis of diffusion processes of durable goods in four major Pacific Rim countries. The estimated coefficients are used to test the hypotheses on country-specific effects and on lead- and lag-time effects on the diffusion rates of consumer durable goods in the Pacific Rim countries. On the basis of the empirical findings, managerial implications are derived and discussed to provide insights into the relationships between diffusion processes and country-specific characteristics. These insights may serve as guidelines in formulating effective marketing strategies for introducing new products into Pacific Rim markets.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many studies found significant divergences between far-eastern cultures, such as Chinese and Korean, and western cultures, such as U.S. and European, in consumers' attitudes and behaviors.
“Many studies dealing with cultural effects found significant divergences between far-eastern cultures, such as Chinese and Korean, and western cultures, such as U.S. and European, in consumers' attitudes and behaviors (Aaker, 2000: Takada & Jain, 1991; Zaichkowsky & Sood, 1989).”
From Do good return policies work across cultures? Effect of lenient return policies on online shopper perceptions in Eastern culture (2013) · cites this paper as Takada & Jain, 1991
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Does culture explain acceptance of new products in a country?: An empirical investigation
Yeniyurt, S., & Townsend, J. D. (2003) · International Marketing Review · doi:10.1108/02651330310485153 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Kittler, M. G., Rygl, D., & Mackinnon, A. (2011) · International Journal of Cross Cultural Management · doi:10.1177/1470595811398797 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
How cultural differences in uncertainty avoidance affect product perceptions
Anne Lee, J., Garbarino, E., & Lerman, D. (2007) · International Marketing Review · doi:10.1108/02651330710755320 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Internet Diffusion in Japan: Cultural Considerations
Ferle, C. L., Edwards, S. M., & Mizuno, Y. (2002) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-42-2-65-79 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Yang, S. J., & Choi, Y. J. (2013) · Asia Marketing Journal · doi:10.53728/2765-6500.1519 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Takada, H., & Jain, D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-04
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 48-54
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2313740117
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 12.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Keywords
- diffusion of innovations, durable goods, Bass diffusion model, cross-national comparison, Pacific Rim countries, country-specific effects, new product launch, marketing strategy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review