The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Ownership Effect in Consumer Responses to Brand Line Stretches
Abstract
In this article, the authors examine how ownership status moderates the effects of stretch direction (up or down), brand image (prestige or nonprestige), and branding strategy (subbrand name or direct) on consumer responses to price-based line stretches. An “ownership effect” is proposed whereby owners have more favorable responses than nonowners to the brand's extensions. The ownership effect occurs for upward and downward stretches of non-prestige brands and for upward stretches of prestige brands. For downward stretches of prestige brands, however, the ownership effect does not occur because of owners’ desire to maintain brand exclusivity. In this situation, a sub-branding strategy protects owners’ parent brand attitudes from dilution. A field study and two lab studies confirm the hypotheses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self
Steele, C. M. (1988) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60229-4 · Cited by 3,697
The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes
Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209158 · Cited by 2,070
Cited by
Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude
Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.40.3.310.19238 · Cited by 2,151
Social identity perspective on brand loyalty
He, H., Li, Y., & Harris, L. (2012) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.03.007 · Cited by 561
Grewal, R., Mehta, R., & Kardes, F. R. (2004) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.41.1.101.25090 · Cited by 229
Striking the Right Balance: Designing Service to Enhance Business-to-Business Relationships
Bolton, R. N., Smith, A. K., & Wagner, J. (2003) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670503005004001 · Cited by 135
Social value and online social shopping intention: the moderating role of experience
Wu, W., Huang, V., Chen, X., Davison, R. M., & Hua, Z. (2018) · Information Technology & People · doi:10.1108/itp-10-2016-0236 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Kirmani, A., Sood, S., & Bridges, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 88-101
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W1983298715
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Ownership Effect in Consumer Responses to Brand Line Stretches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002224299906300107
- The paper
- Kirmani, A., Sood, S., & Bridges, S. (1999). The Ownership Effect in Consumer Responses to Brand Line Stretches. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299906300107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.