The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Using a Variety-Seeking Model to Identify Substitute and Complementary Relationships among Competing Products
Abstract
Current techniques using brand-switching data to infer competitive relationships among products are based on the assumption that those brands most frequently switched between are the closest substitutes. For product classes in which variety seeking is an important determinant of consumer behavior, this assumption is probably violated. A technique is proposed which accounts for the fact that consumers may switch between brands not because the brands are substitutes, but because the brands complement one another to meet the consumers’ desire for variety. The approach utilizes constrained nonlinear optimization to determine model coefficients that describe substitution and complementarity among brands. The proposed technique is illustrated with individual consumption histories for a frequently purchased packaged good and is shown to extend the range of insights provided by current brand-switching techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The use of lisrel in validating marketing constructs
Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (1991) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/0167-8116(91)90027-5 · Cited by 1,848
"Migrating" to New Service Providers: Toward a Unifying Framework of Consumers' Switching Behaviors
Bansal, H. S. (2005) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070304267928 · Cited by 975
Why Switch? Product Category–Level Explanations for True Variety-Seeking Behavior
Trijp, H. C. M. V., Hoyer, W. D., & Inman, J. J. (1996) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379603300303 · Cited by 621
Consumer innovativeness and perceived risk: implications for high technology product adoption
Hirunyawipada, T., & Paswan, A. K. (2006) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363760610674310 · Cited by 419
Modeling Consumer Demand for Variety
Kim, J., Allenby, G. M., & Rossi, P. E. (2002) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.21.3.229.143 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Lattin, J. M., & Mcalister, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1985-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 330-339
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2020845025
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using a Variety-Seeking Model to Identify Substitute and Complementary Relationships among Competing Products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002224378502200308
- The paper
- Lattin, J. M., & Mcalister, L. (1985). Using a Variety-Seeking Model to Identify Substitute and Complementary Relationships among Competing Products. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378502200308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.