The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advertising Exposure, Loyalty, and Brand Purchase: A Two-Stage Model of Choice
Abstract
Information processing theory and findings on advertising response suggest a nonlinear response to repetitive ad exposure, mediated by brand loyalty. The response can occur in either or both of the hypothesized stages of purchase: brand choice and quantity choice. A tobit-type analysis of scanner purchases (with TV exposures) of a mature product category appears to support these hypotheses. The effect of advertising is generally nonlinear and its impact on volume purchased is mediated by brand loyalty. Advertising seems to reinforce preference for current brands rather than stimulate brand switching. However, features, displays, and especially price have a stronger impact on response than does advertising. The effect of brand loyalty dominates that of the other variables.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.97 · Cited by 813
Cited by
How advertising works: what do we really know?
Vakratsas, D., & Ambler, T. (1999) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299906300103 · Cited by 1,436
A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure
Kamakura, W. A., & Russell, G. J. (1989) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378902600401 · Cited by 1,348
Relationship quality as a predictor of B2B customer loyalty
Rauyruen, P., & Miller, K. E. (2007) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.11.006 · Cited by 1,123
Reciprocal Spillover Effects: A Strategic Benefit of Brand Extensions
Balachander, S., & Ghose, S. (2003) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.1.4.18594 · Cited by 417
Lee, S., Jeon, S., & Kim, D. (2011) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.09.016 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Tellis, G. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1988-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 134-144
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2085479788
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.