The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Space: A Minimum-Distance Database and Applications to International Studies
Abstract
In this overview of a new database and approach to measuring distance among historical and contemporary independent nation-states, we review the utility of space to theory and empirical research in international studies. We identify weaknesses in existing empirical data on distances and contiguity among nations. Categorical data on distance treat proximity as an either-or issue and do not permit identifying degree of proximity among states. Continuous measures of distances between midpoints, such as capital cities, often overstate the actual distances between state borders and suffer for large states and irregular territories. We outline a new alternative approach, based on measuring the minimum distance for pairs of polities in the international system, which remedies some of these shortcomings. The current implementation of the minimum-distance database includes the minimum distances for all polities within 950 km of each other from 1875 to the present. We demonstrate the enhanced flexibility of the new minimum-distance approach relative to existing alternatives. Moreover, we illustrate how variables constructed from distance measures, combined with spatial statistical techniques, can contribute substantively to international relations and cross-national comparative research. We demonstrate the importance of dependence among geographical neighbors by examining the link between levels of economic wealth and prospects for democracy in the context of regional interdependence among states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082979 · Cited by 6,840
The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1988
Summers, R., & Heston, A. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937941 · Cited by 3,429
Cited by
The impact of UN and US economic sanctions on GDP growth
Neuenkirch, M., & Neumeier, F. (2015) · European Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.09.001 · Cited by 349
Environmental Kuznets curves: A spatial econometric approach
Maddison, D. (2006) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2005.07.002 · Cited by 349
Illiberal Norm Diffusion: How Do Governments Learn to Restrict Nongovernmental Organizations?
Glasius, M., Schalk, J., & De Lange, M. (2020) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqaa019 · Cited by 137
Do they know something we don’t? Diffusion of repression in authoritarian regimes
Olar, R.-G. (2019) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343318822718 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Gleditsch, K. S., & Ward, M. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Peace Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-11-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 739-758
- ISSN
- 0022-3433 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3578
- OpenAlex
- W2055325415
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Space: A Minimum-Distance Database and Applications to International Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0022343301038006006
- The paper
- Gleditsch, K. S., & Ward, M. D. (2001). Measuring Space: A Minimum-Distance Database and Applications to International Studies. Journal of Peace Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343301038006006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.