Introducing the UCDP Georeferenced Event Dataset
Abstract
This article presents the UCDP Georeferenced Event Dataset (UCDP GED). The UCDP GED is an event dataset that disaggregates three types of organized violence (state-based conflict, non-state conflict, and one-sided violence) both spatially and temporally. Each event – defined as an instance of organized violence with at least one fatality – comes with date, geographical location, and identifiers that allow the dataset to be linked to and merged with other UCDP datasets. The first version of the dataset covers events of fatal violence on the African continent between 1989 and 2010. This article, firstly, introduces the rationale for the new dataset, and explains the basic coding procedures as well as the quality controls. Secondly, we discuss some of the data’s potential weaknesses in representing the universe of organized violence, as well as some potential biases induced by the operationalizations. Thirdly, we provide an example of how the data can be used, by illustrating the association between cities and organized violence, taking population density into account. The UCDP GED is a useful resource for conflict analyses below the state and country-year levels, and can provide us with new insights into the geographical determinants and temporal sequencing of warfare and violence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 22 · Cited by 1,238
- Authors
- Sundberg, R., & Melander, E.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Melander, Erik
- Venue
- Journal of Peace Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-07-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 523-532
- ISSN
- 0022-3433 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3578
- OpenAlex
- W2106483804
- Cited by
- 1,238
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 130 · 2025: 104 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 161 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 156 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 111.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Peace Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
- Keywords
- organized violence, one-sided violence, fatal violence, African conflicts, data quality, coding procedures, population density, urban violence, geography of conflict
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review