Why is There So Little Criminal Justice Theory? Neglected Macro- and Micro-Level Links between Organization and Power
Abstract
This article seeks an answer to the question of why there is relatively little, and no clearly predominant, criminal justice theory. The answer offered focuses on the apparent randomness of criminal justice operations. A structural-contextual theory of criminal justice is outlined, beginning with the orienting premise that the normal mode for North American, and perhaps most Western democratic systems of criminal justice, is a loosely coupled form of organization. However, atypical political environments often mandate departures from normal criminal justice operations. The thesis of the article is that neglected connections between the imposition of political power and organizational forms in the criminal justice system hold a key to understanding the operations of this system, in typical as well as atypical situations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tighter coupling has consequences for punishment severity and disparity.
“This tighter coupling then has consequences for punishment severity and disparity”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Hagan 1989
Under certain circumstances (e.g., policy changes, differences in organizational environments), criminal justice organizations function with greater coordination and interdependence, i.e., tighter coupling.
“But under certain circumstances (e.g., policy changes, differences in organizational environments), criminal justice organizations function with greater coordination and interdependence, i.e., tighter coupling.”
From Criminal Justice in Indian Country: A Theoretical and Empirical Agenda (2019) · cites this paper as Hagan 1989
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 39 · Cited by 220
- Authors
- HAGAN, J.
- Corresponding author
- HAGAN, JOHN
- ORCID
- HAGAN, JOHN
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1989-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 116-135
- ISSN
- 0022-4278 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-731X
- OpenAlex
- W2143811466
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 59.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Keywords
- criminal justice theory, loosely coupled organizations, political power, criminal justice organizations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review