Demeanor and Arrest: Additional Evidence from Previously Unpublished Data
Abstract
Across more than four decades of previous research, social scientists have reported that demeanor and other extralegal factors shape police actions such as arrest. Recently, however, Klinger has asserted that all previous research is suspect because it failed to control for crime and failed to limit demeanor to legally permissible words and displays of hostility. The present research further probes this issue using previously unpublished data. The key findings are several. Demeanor matters when it is limited to legally permissible words and displays of hostility and when crime is partially controlled, although the effects of demeanor vary with how it is represented. Other extralegal variables, especially race and class, also matter. This analysis therefore provides little reason for questioning the agreement reached over four decades that demeanor and other extralegal variables shape police actions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Police decisions can be affected by a suspect's demeanor.
“demeanor (Engel, Sobol, & Worden, 2000;Klinger, 1996;Lundman, 1996;Worden & Shepard, 1996)”
From Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy (2010) · cites this paper as Lundman, 1996
Cites
Police Organization in the Twentieth Century
Reiss (1992) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/449193 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gau, J. M., & Brunson, R. K. (2010) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418820902763889 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
POLICE DISRESPECT TOWARD THE PUBLIC: AN ENCOUNTER‐BASED ANALYSIS*
MASTROFSKI, S. D., REISIG, M. D., & McCLUSKEY, J. D. (2002) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00965.x · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Nix, J., Pickett, J. T., Wolfe, S. E., & Campbell, B. A. (2017) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2017.1334808 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Disproportionate Minority Contact in Canada: Police and Visible Minority Youth
Fitzgerald, R. T., & Carrington, P. J. (2011) · Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice · doi:10.3138/cjccj.53.4.449 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Nix, J., Pickett, J. T., & Mitchell, R. J. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-019-09363-4 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- LUNDMAN, R. J.
- Corresponding author
- LUNDMAN, RICHARD J.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 306-323
- ISSN
- 0022-4278 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-731X
- OpenAlex
- W2166522835
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 12.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- extralegal factors, race and policing, crime control, police discretion, racial bias in policing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review