Examining Grow Your Own Programs Across the Teacher Development Continuum: Mining Research on Teachers of Color and Nontraditional Educator Pipelines
Abstract
Grow Your Own (GYO) programs are cited in recent policy briefs as viable pathways for increasing the racial/ethnic diversity of teachers, yet recent scholarship on GYO programs is minimal. To address this issue, this article investigates what we know, and do not know, about GYO programs, by examining a range of data sources on different types of GYO program teacher pools (e.g., middle/high school, paraprofessional, community activists/parents mentors) and making sense of findings over a continuum of teacher development (e.g., recruitment, preparation, induction, and retention). Based on a research synthesis within and across GYO program teacher pools, we argue implications for policy, practice, and research that should accompany increased recommendations for expanding GYO models for Teachers of Color.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Media-amplified narratives of failure supported expanding non-university pathways, including new Graduate Schools of Education and Grow Your Own programmes in the United States.
“Media-amplified narratives of failure supported expanding non-university pathways, including new Graduate Schools of Education (nGSE) and Grow Your Own (GYO) programmes in the United States”
From A prescriptive continuum analytical framework for measuring school curriculum structure (2026) · cites this paper as Gist, Bianco, and Lynn 2018
Cites
Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth
Yosso *, T. J. (2005) · Race Ethnicity and Education · doi:10.1080/1361332052000341006 · Cited by 7,546 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This is connected to the idea that TOC possess a form of “community cultural wealth” that imbues them with “an array of knowledge, skills, [and] abilities” (Yosso, 2005, p. 77) to effectively teach Black and Brown youth.”
BackgroundJacsó, P. (2008) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684520810866010 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Redding, C. (2019) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654319853545 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Gelber, S. (2022) · American Journal of Education · doi:10.1086/721860 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Hulme, M. (2026) · Educational Action Research · doi:10.1080/09650792.2026.2626541 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Media-amplified narratives of failure supported expanding non-university pathways, including new Graduate Schools of Education (nGSE) and Grow Your Own (GYO) programmes in the United States (Cochran-Smith et al. 2020; Gelber 2022; Gist, Bianco, and Lynn 2018; Zeichner and Conklin 2016).”
- Authors
- Gist, C. D., Bianco, M., & Lynn, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Houston (US)
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
- Portland State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gist, Conra D.
- Venue
- Journal of Teacher Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-08-12
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-25
- ISSN
- 0022-4871 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7816
- OpenAlex
- W2885044131
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13
- FWCI
- 44.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
- PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
- Keywords
- Grow Your Own programs, teachers of color, teacher recruitment, teacher preparation, teacher induction, teacher retention, teacher diversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review