Teachers’ Conceptions of Fairness in Classroom Assessment: An Empirical Study
Open accessAbstract
With heightened equity pursuits in 21st century schools and the key role of assessment in teachers’ concerns with educational equity, scholars have recently attempted to empirically investigate teachers’ conceptions of fairness in classroom assessment. This study contributes to this growing literature and draws on interview data from 27 experienced high school teachers to further appreciate the factors that propel teachers’ fairness conceptions. The results indicate that the teachers’ conceptions of fairness in classroom assessment were influenced by three themes: (a) individual mechanisms, (b) social mechanisms, and (c) dialectical relationships between individual and social mechanisms. These themes underscored how teachers’ individual philosophies and experiences interacted with their encounters with social conditions of society, schools, and classrooms to influence their conceptions and articulated practices of fairness in classroom assessments. The results contribute to provoke conversations around assessment fairness education during pre- and in-service programs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Formative assessment allows for personalized support, addressing diverse learning needs and helping to close achievement gaps.
“Additionally, it allows for personalized support, addressing diverse learning needs and helping to close achievement gaps [61][62][63].”
From Formative assessment and feedback in medical education: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 189 (2026) · cites this paper as [62]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Rasooli, A., Rasegh, A., Zandi, H., & Firoozi, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- University of Tehran (IR)
- Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Rasooli, Amirhossein
- Venue
- Journal of Teacher Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-11-04
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 260-273
- ISSN
- 0022-4871 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7816
- OpenAlex
- W4308198949
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 9.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Teacher Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- assessment fairness, classroom assessment, teacher conceptions, educational equity, secondary school teachers, assessment practices, teacher professional development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review