The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Expert-Novice Differences in Teaching: A Cognitive Analysis and Implications for Teacher Education
Abstract
Livingston and Borko examine the implications of theory and research on pedagogical expertise for teacher education. They describe an investigation of the thoughts and actions of a small number of expert and novice teachers. Differences among the teachers are analyzed from two perspectives: teach ing as a complex cognitive skill and improvisational perfor mance. They then offer recommendations for teacher educa tion practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
Cited by
Self-regulated learning about university teaching: an exploratory study.
Kreber, C., Castleden, H., Erfani, N., & Wright, T. (2005) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/1356251052000305543 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Livingston, C., & Borko, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Teacher Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1989-07
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 36-42
- ISSN
- 0022-4871 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7816
- OpenAlex
- W2117962569
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 47.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expert-Novice Differences in Teaching: A Cognitive Analysis and Implications for Teacher Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002248718904000407
- The paper
- Livingston, C., & Borko, H. (1989). Expert-Novice Differences in Teaching: A Cognitive Analysis and Implications for Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718904000407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
