The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pedagogical Content Knowledge: From a Mathematical Case to a Modified Conception
Abstract
Eight fifth-grade teachers were interviewed about their teaching of equivalence of fractions. Analysis of the interviews resulted in a conception of pedagogical content knowledge consisting of four components: subject matter for instructional purposes, students' understanding of the subject matter, media for instruction in the subject matter, and instructional processes for the subject matter. Ambiguities and complexities inherent in the notion of pedagogical content knowledge are discussed, and revisions in teacher education practices designed to integrate con tent and pedagogy are suggested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching
SHULMAN, L. S. (1986) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x015002004 · Cited by 18,546
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
Cited by
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x · Cited by 12,604
Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)
Graham, C. R. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010 · Cited by 709
Azam, S. (2020) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education · doi:10.29333/ejmste/8941 · Cited by 13
Hartmuth, D., Amin, R. M., Schlichting, D., Schött, S., Haudenschild, J., Küchenhoff, H., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2470563 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Marks, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Teacher Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1990-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 3-11
- ISSN
- 0022-4871 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7816
- OpenAlex
- W2004747846
- Cited by
- 549
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
