Cited by 313Carcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentLiver physiology and pathologyHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis

Diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced carcinogenic liver injury in mice

Open access
Tolba, R, Kraus, T, Liedtke, C, Schwarz, M, Weiskirchen, R·2015·Laboratory Animals

Abstract

The toxic properties of various nitrosamines in animals and humans are well established. The parenteral or oral administration of the smallest quantities of diethylnitrosamine (DEN) or dimethylnitrosamine (DMN) results in severe liver damage. Most prominent are intense neutrophilic infiltration, extensive centrilobular haemorrhagic necrosis, bile duct proliferation, fibrosis, and bridging necrosis that ends in hepatocarcinogenesis. Due to the robustness of the induced hepatic alterations, the application of DEN in rodents has become an attractive experimental model for studies aimed at understanding the pathogenetic alterations underlying the formation of liver cancer, which represents one of the most common malignancies in humans worldwide. However, several studies have shown that the hepatocarcinogenic effects of nitrosamines might vary with the genetic background of the animals, their sex, their age, and other factors that might impact the outcome of experimentation. We present general guidelines for working with DEN, and a detailed protocol that allows the establishment of highly reproducible liver cancer in mice. The outcome of liver injury after the application of DEN in mice, as estimated by the formation of cirrhosis and cancer, appears to be a suitable animal model for the analysis of some aspects and processes that promote the pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma in humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0023677215570086

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tolba, R., Kraus, T., Liedtke, C., Schwarz, M., & Weiskirchen, R.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE)
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Weiskirchen, R
Venue
Laboratory Animals
Published
2015-04
Volume
49
Issue
1_suppl
Pages
59-69
ISSN
  • 0023-6772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1117
OpenAlex
W2021590347
Cited by
313
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Laboratory Animals (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR57)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Keywords
diethylnitrosamine, hepatocarcinogenesis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver injury, nitrosamines, animal models, liver cirrhosis, hemorrhagic necrosis, bile duct proliferation, fibrosis, bridging necrosis, neutrophil infiltration, genetic background, sex differences, age effects
MeSH terms
Animals, Carcinogens, Environmental, Diethylnitrosamine, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Laboratory Animal Science, Liver Neoplasms, Experimental, Guidelines as Topic, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review