Simultaneous Bilingualism and the Perception of a Language-Specific Vowel Contrast in the First Year of Life
Abstract
Behavioral studies have shown that while young infants can discriminate many different phonetic contrasts, a shift from a language-general to a language-specific pattern of discrimination is found during the second semester of life, beginning earlier for vowels than for consonants. This age-related decline in sensitivity to perceive non-native contrasts has been generally attested in monolinguals. In order to analyze the impact of bilingual exposure on the perception of native-sound contrasts and the early building of language-specific contrastive categories, four-month-old and eight-month-old infants from Spanish monolingual, Catalan monolingual and Spanish-Catalan bilingual environments have been tested with a familiarization-preference procedure on a vowel contrast present only in Catalan: /e/-/epsilon/. As expected, younger infants were all able to perceive this contrast, independently of the language of exposure. However, by eight months, only infants from Catalan monolingual environments succeeded. Although the decline in sensitivity with the monolingual Spanish group was expected, the results with the bilingual group challenge the view that mere exposure is enough to maintain the capacity to perceive a contrast. An additional experiment at 12 months of age indicated that bilinguals finally regained discrimination. Together these results suggest a specific developmental pattern of perceptual reorganization in bilingual exposure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Relative to monolingual infants, bilingual infants' native speech categories take longer to establish.
“Relative to monolingual infants, among bilingual infants: native speech categories take longer to establish (Bosch and Sebastián-Gallés, 2003);”
From Plasticity, Variability and Age in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism (2018) · cites this paper as Bosch and Sebastián-Gallés, 2003
Relative to monolingual infants, bilingual infants have less input per language, with asymmetric relative frequency of phones within and across dual-language input.
“there is less input per language, with an asymmetric relative frequency of phones within and across the dual-language input (Bosch and Sebastián-Gallés, 2003);”
From Plasticity, Variability and Age in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism (2018) · cites this paper as Bosch and Sebastián-Gallés, 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 497
- Authors
- Bosch, L., & Sebastián-Gallés, N.
- Affiliations
- Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
- University of Barcelona
- Corresponding author
- Bosch, Laura
- ORCID
- Bosch, Laura
- Venue
- Language and Speech
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 217-243
- ISSN
- 0023-8309 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-6053
- OpenAlex
- W2165454511
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 8.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language and Speech (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- simultaneous bilingualism, vowel contrasts, Catalan, Spanish language, perceptual reorganization, bilingual infants
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Infant, Language Development, Psychological Tests, Speech Perception, Multilingualism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review