The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Smooth Signal Redundancy Hypothesis: A Functional Explanation for Relationships between Redundancy, Prosodic Prominence, and Duration in Spontaneous Speech
Abstract
This paper explores two related factors which influence variation in duration, prosodic structure and redundancy in spontaneous speech. We argue that the constraint of producing robust communication while efficiently expending articulatory effort leads to an inverse relationship between language redundancy and duration. The inverse relationship improves communication robustness by spreading information more evenly across the speech signal, yielding a smoother signal redundancy profile. We argue that prosodic prominence is a linguistic means of achieving smooth signal redundancy. Prosodic prominence increases syllable duration and coincides to a large extent with unpredictable sections of speech, and thus leads to a smoother signal redundancy. The results of linear regressions carried out between measures of redundancy, syllable duration and prosodic structure in a large corpus of spontaneous speech confirm: (1) an inverse relationship between language redundancy and duration, and (2) a strong relationship between prosodic prominence and duration. The fact that a large proportion of the variance predicted by language redundancy and prosodic prominence is nonunique suggests that, in English, prosodic prominence structure is the means with which constraints caused by a robust signal requirement are expressed in spontaneous speech.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Cited by
Kidd, C., Piantadosi, S. T., & Aslin, R. N. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036399 · Cited by 783
Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density
Florian Jaeger, T. (2010) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002 · Cited by 733
The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic
Smith, N. J., & Levy, R. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013 · Cited by 725
Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication
Piantadosi, S. T., Tily, H., & Gibson, E. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1012551108 · Cited by 695
The communicative function of ambiguity in language
Piantadosi, S. T., Tily, H., & Gibson, E. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.004 · Cited by 628
“…used to explain phenomena such as discourse-level predictability (Genzel & Charniak, 2002, 2003; Piantadosi & Gibson, 2008; Qian & Jaeger, submitted), syntactic choice (Jaeger, 2006; Levy & Jaeger, 2007; Jaeger, 2010) and reduction (Van Son & Pols, 2003; Aylett & Turk, 2004; Frank & Jaeger, 2008).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Aylett, M., & Turk, A.
- Venue
- Language and Speech
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-56
- ISSN
- 0023-8309 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-6053
- OpenAlex
- W2140188190
- Cited by
- 781
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Smooth Signal Redundancy Hypothesis: A Functional Explanation for Relationships between Redundancy, Prosodic Prominence, and Duration in Spontaneous Speech. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00238309040470010201
- The paper
- Aylett, M., & Turk, A. (2004). The Smooth Signal Redundancy Hypothesis: A Functional Explanation for Relationships between Redundancy, Prosodic Prominence, and Duration in Spontaneous Speech. Language and Speech. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309040470010201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.