Segmental Influences on the Perception of High Pitch Accent Scaling in American English
Abstract
Researchers investigating a broad array of questions in spoken language prosody routinely base their arguments on measurements taken from the F0 contours of representative speech samples. These analyses, however, frequently involve abstracting F0 contours away from the segmental strings that bear them, potentially overlooking in the process the role played by segmental qualities such as sonority or periodicity in the realization of F0 patterns by speakers and their interpretation by listeners. This paper reports the results of two experiments investigating how perception of F0 contours is affected by the segmental string over which those contours are realized. The first focuses on gaps in F0 contours created by voiceless obstruents such as stops and fricatives, while the second investigates F0 intervals spanning lower-sonority voiced segments, such as nasals and voiced fricatives. While these two scenarios might at first seem unrelated, we argue that listeners treat both with a single mechanism in perception, namely, by reducing (potentially to zero) the amount of weight accorded to those portions of the contour for determination of the speaker’s intended F0 scaling level. We present an account of both effects within a unified model of F0 scaling perception called TCoG-F, with discussion of its implications for phonetic and phonological intonation research going forward.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 1
- Authors
- Barnes, J., Brugos, A., Veilleux, N., & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Simmons University (US)
- Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
- Corresponding author
- Barnes, Jonathan
- Venue
- Language and Speech
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2024-08-07
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 278-312
- ISSN
- 0023-8309 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-6053
- OpenAlex
- W4401434463
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language and Speech (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (BCS-1023853)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
- Keywords
- pitch accent, intonation perception, sonority, periodicity, voiceless obstruents, nasals, voiced fricatives, American English, prosody
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Phonetics, Pitch Perception, Sound Spectrography, Speech Acoustics, Speech Perception, Voice Quality, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review