Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269Phonetics and Phonology ResearchLinguistic Variation and MorphologyGender Studies in Language

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sociocultural Aspects of Pitch Differences between Japanese and Dutch Women

van Bezooijen, Reneé·1995·Language and Speech

Abstract

Japanese women have been found to have higher pitches than Dutch women. This finding has been explained in the past by assuming that Japanese women raise their pitch in order to project a vocal image associated with feminine attributes of powerlessness. In the present study three hypotheses underlying such an assumption were tested experimentally: (1) the association of high pitch with attributes of physical and psychological powerlessness (short, weak, dependent, modest) in the Dutch and Japanese cultures, (2) a stronger differentiation between the ideal woman and man, in terms of powerlessness/power, in Japan than in the Netherlands, and (3) a preference for high pitch in women in Japan and for medium or low pitch in women in the Netherlands. All three hypotheses were confirmed. However, results also suggest a strong emphasis in Japan on masculinity in men, possibly leading to a lowering of pitch.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002383099503800303

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. BROUWER, D., 1989, Gender variation in Dutch: A sociolinguistic study of Amsterdam speech.
  2. OHALA, J.J., 1994, Sound symbolism., 325
  3. OHARA, Y., 1992, Locating power. Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, 2, 468
  4. OKAMOTO, S., 1992, Locating power. Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, 2, 478
  5. TERASAWA, R., 1984, Onseigengoigaku, 25, 189
  6. TSUGE, S., 1987, Bull. Phonet. Jap., 185, 2

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
van Bezooijen, R.
Affiliations
University of Nijmegen
Venue
Language and Speech
Published
1995-07
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
253-265
ISSN
  • 0023-8309 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-6053
OpenAlex
W2153555222
Cited by
269
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Language and Speech (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
Keywords
voice pitch, Japanese women, Dutch women, gender stereotypes, femininity, masculinity, powerlessness, ideal woman, Japanese culture, Dutch culture
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Pitch Perception, Verbal Behavior, Women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sociocultural Aspects of Pitch Differences between Japanese and Dutch Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002383099503800303
The paper
van Bezooijen, R. (1995). Sociocultural Aspects of Pitch Differences between Japanese and Dutch Women. Language and Speech. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099503800303