Cited by 614Patient Satisfaction in HealthcarePatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealthcare Quality and Management

Patient satisfaction: What we know about and what we still need to explore

Aharony, Lea, Strasser, Stephen·1993·Medical Care Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002570879305000104

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CSQ is a widely used measure of satisfaction with health and mental health care treatment and has shown adequate reliability and validity in various samples.

    “The CSQ, with 8 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale, is a widely used measure of satisfaction with health and mental health care treatment and has shown adequate reliability and validity in various samples.1”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aharony, L., & Strasser, S.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
Medical Care Review
Published
1993-03
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
49-79
ISSN
0025-7087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027202747
Cited by
614
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 21
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
patient satisfaction, patient experience, quality of care, quality of care measurement
MeSH terms
Health Services Research, Models, Theoretical, Planning Techniques, Quality of Health Care, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Hospital-Patient Relations, Selection Bias, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review