Cited by 44Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthPsychedelics and Drug StudiesReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Potential use of ayahuasca in grief therapy

González, Débora, Carvalho, María, Cantillo, Jordi, Aixalá, Marc, Farré, Magí·2019·OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying

Abstract

The death of a loved one is ultimately a universal experience. However, conventional interventions employed for people suffering with uncomplicated grief have gathered little empirical support. The present study aimed to explore the potential effects of ayahuasca on grief. We compared 30 people who had taken ayahuasca with 30 people who had attended peer-support groups, measuring level of grief and experiential avoidance. We also examined themes in participant responses to an open-ended question regarding their experiences with ayahuasca. The ayahuasca group presented a lower level of grief in the Present Feelings Scale of Texas Revised Inventory of Grief, showing benefits in some psychological and interpersonal dimensions. Qualitative responses described experiences of emotional release, biographical memories, and experiences of contact with the deceased. Additionally, some benefits were identified regarding the ayahuasca experiences. These results provide preliminary data about the potential of ayahuasca as a therapeutic tool in treatments for grief.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0030222817710879

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 94 · Cited by 44

Authors
González, D., Carvalho, M., Cantillo, J., Aixalá, M., & Farré, M.
Affiliations
  • International Center for Ethnobotanical Education, Research, and Service (ES)
  • ICEERS—International Center for Ethnobotanical Education Research & Service, Roosendaal, The Netherlands
  • Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Corresponding author
González, Débora
Venue
OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
Published
2017-05-30
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
260-285
ISSN
  • 0030-2228 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-3764
OpenAlex
W2619396520
Cited by
44
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Beckley Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
ayahuasca, grief therapy, complicated grief, peer support groups, experiential avoidance, loss of a loved one, emotional release, biographical memory, psychedelic therapy
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Grief, Humans, Male, Phytotherapy, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Help Groups, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Plant Preparations, Banisteriopsis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review