Potential use of ayahuasca in grief therapy
Abstract
The death of a loved one is ultimately a universal experience. However, conventional interventions employed for people suffering with uncomplicated grief have gathered little empirical support. The present study aimed to explore the potential effects of ayahuasca on grief. We compared 30 people who had taken ayahuasca with 30 people who had attended peer-support groups, measuring level of grief and experiential avoidance. We also examined themes in participant responses to an open-ended question regarding their experiences with ayahuasca. The ayahuasca group presented a lower level of grief in the Present Feelings Scale of Texas Revised Inventory of Grief, showing benefits in some psychological and interpersonal dimensions. Qualitative responses described experiences of emotional release, biographical memories, and experiences of contact with the deceased. Additionally, some benefits were identified regarding the ayahuasca experiences. These results provide preliminary data about the potential of ayahuasca as a therapeutic tool in treatments for grief.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous observational research has suggested that ceremonial use of ayahuasca has therapeutic value in reducing the severity of grief.
“Previous observational research, however, has suggested that the ceremonial use of ayahuasca has therapeutic value in reducing the severity of grief (34–36).”
From Ayahuasca-assisted meaning reconstruction therapy for grief: a non-randomized clinical trial protocol (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 94 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- González, D., Carvalho, M., Cantillo, J., Aixalá, M., & Farré, M.
- Affiliations
- International Center for Ethnobotanical Education, Research, and Service (ES)
- ICEERS—International Center for Ethnobotanical Education Research & Service, Roosendaal, The Netherlands
- Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Corresponding author
- González, Débora
- Venue
- OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-05-30
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 260-285
- ISSN
- 0030-2228 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-3764
- OpenAlex
- W2619396520
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Beckley Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
- Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Keywords
- ayahuasca, grief therapy, complicated grief, peer support groups, experiential avoidance, loss of a loved one, emotional release, biographical memory, psychedelic therapy
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Grief, Humans, Male, Phytotherapy, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Help Groups, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Plant Preparations, Banisteriopsis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review