The interpersonal side of research-practice partnerships
Abstract
In the past decade, research-practice partnerships (RPPs) have grown in number and reputation. Stephanie Brown and Annie Allen describe the varied ways partnerships facilitate more sustained and productive relationships between researchers and practitioners. They share key findings from a comparative case study of three different types of RPPs focused on mathematics instructional improvement conducted by the National Center for Research in Policy and Practice (NCRPP) and make recommendations for how partnerships can build more authentic bridges between research and practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Creating equitable relationships within RPPs is complex given preexisting hierarchical, geographical, and institutional barriers.
“Creating equitable relationships within RPPs is complex given the preexisting hierarchical, geographical, and institutional barriers (Brown & Allen, 2021).”
From Trauma-Informed Research-Practice Partnership Building to Support Early Childhood Educators in an Appalachian Community (2023) · cites this paper as Brown & Allen, 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Caudle, L., Grist, C., & Thompson, H. (2023) · Theory & Practice in Rural Education · doi:10.3776/tpre.2023.v13n2p51-75
- Authors
- Brown, S., & Allen, A.
- Venue
- Phi Delta Kappan
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-03-23
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 20-25
- ISSN
- 0031-7217 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-6487
- OpenAlex
- W3147687074
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Phi Delta Kappan (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Keywords
- research-practice collaboration, researcher-practitioner relationship, mathematics education, teaching improvement, research-practice gap, partnership types
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
