CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 121

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Addressing Racial Disparities in Incarceration

Mauer, Marc·2011·The Prison Journal
DOI 10.1177/0032885511415227
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article reviews the current trends and impact of mass incarceration on communities of color, with a focus on criminal justice policy and practice contributors to racial disparity. The impact of these disproportionate incarceration rates on public safety, offenders, and communities are discussed. Recommendations for criminal justice and other policy reforms to reduce unwarranted racial disparities are offered.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0032885511415227

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Armstrong K., 1999, Chicago Tribune, C1
  2. Baldus D. C., 2004, DePaul Law Review, 53, 1411
  3. Blumstein A., 1993, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 73, 743
  4. Bobo L. D., 2006, Social Research: An International Quarterly, 73, 445, 10.1353/sor.2006.0010 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bonczar T., 2003, Prevalence of imprisonment in the U.S. population, 1974-2001
  6. 10.1177/0887403407308476 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/0022427894031002005 · DOI
  8. Durose M. R., 2007, Contacts between police and the public, 2005
  9. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2009, Uniform crime reports: Crime in the United States
  10. Hartney C., 2009, Created equal: Racial and ethnic disparities in the U.S. criminal justice system
  11. 10.1093/sf/75.2.619 · DOI
  12. Mauer M., 2006, Race to incarcerate, 10.2307/jj.26193051 · DOI
  13. Mauer M., 2009, Criminal Justice, 23, 16
  14. Mauer M., 2009, The changing racial dynamics of the war on drugs
  15. Mauer M., 2007, A 25-year quagmire: The war on drugs and its impact on American society
  16. New Jersey Commission to Review Criminal Sentencing, 2007, Supplemental report on New Jersey’s drug free zone crimes & proposal for reform
  17. The Pew Charitable Trusts, 2010, Collateral costs: Incarceration’s effects on economic mobility
  18. Poe-Yamagata E., 2000, And justice for some
  19. Riley K., 1997, Crack, powder cocaine, and heroin: Drug purchase and drug use patterns in six cities
  20. Schnake T., 2010, The history of bail and pretrial release
  21. The Sentencing Project, 2008, Reducing racial disparity in the criminal justice system
  22. Spohn C., 2000, Criminal justice, 427
  23. Steinhauer J., 2010, New York Times, A21
  24. 10.1086/588492 · DOI
  25. 10.1037/e506712011-001 · DOI
  26. U.S. v. Leviner, 31 F.Supp 2d 23 (Mass D. 1998). · DOI
  27. U.S. Sentencing Commission, 1991, Special report to the Congress: Mandatory minimum penalties in the federal criminal justice system
  28. West H. C., 2010, Prisoners in
  29. 10.1162/DAED_a_00019 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 121

Metadata

Authors
Mauer, M.
Affiliations
The Sentencing Project, Washington, DC, USA
Venue
The Prison Journal
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2011-08-19
Volume
91
Issue
3_suppl
Pages
87S-101S
ISSN
  • 0032-8855
  • 1552-7522
DOI
10.1177/0032885511415227
Cited by
121
References
0
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Addressing Racial Disparities in Incarceration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0032885511415227
The paper
Mauer, M. (2011). Addressing Racial Disparities in Incarceration. The Prison Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885511415227