Cited by 44Disability Education and EmploymentHigher Education Research StudiesDisability Rights and Representation

Accommodation Use and Academic Outcomes for College Students With Disabilities

Blasey, Julia, Wang, Cixin, Blasey, Ralph·2023·Psychological Reports

Abstract

Despite the availability of disability support services, college students with disabilities continue to face poorer academic outcomes than their peers without disabilities. The majority of eligible college students with disabilities do not register with their campus disability service to receive accommodations or supports. Among those who do utilize disability services, findings have been mixed regarding the relation between service use and students’ academic outcomes. Further, few studies have measured the use of disability services over time. The current study used secondary data to examine the relation between accommodation use and academic outcomes of undergraduate students with disabilities ( N = 1980) who registered with the campus disability service during a 4-year study period. Descriptive findings for academic and accommodation use patterns are discussed with regard to gender, race/ethnicity, and disability type. Regression analyses showed that earlier registration with the disability service and longer duration of service use predicted more positive student outcomes, as measured by cumulative GPA and time to graduation. Continued accommodation use also positively predicted within-subject changes in students’ semester GPAs across the study period. However, services appear to be under-utilized, with 25% of participants only using accommodations for a single semester across the study period. This work has implications for improving service delivery within university disability offices to ensure students with disabilities can access needed supports in college.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00332941221078011

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blasey, J., Wang, C., & Blasey, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Blasey, Julia
Venue
Psychological Reports
Published
2022-03-18
Volume
126
Issue
4
Pages
1891-1909
ISSN
  • 0033-2941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-691X
OpenAlex
W4220846658
Cited by
44
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
8.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
university students with disabilities, disability accommodation, educational outcomes, GPA, time to graduation, service utilization, length of service, gender differences, race and ethnicity, disability type, undergraduate students
MeSH terms
Ethnicity, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, Students, Time Factors, Universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review