The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parental Delay or Refusal of Vaccine Doses, Childhood Vaccination Coverage at 24 Months of Age, and the Health Belief Model
Open accessAbstract
Objective.: We evaluated the association between parents' beliefs about vaccines, their decision to delay or refuse vaccines for their children, and vaccination coverage of children at aged 24 months. Methods.: We used data from 11,206 parents of children aged 24–35 months at the time of the 2009 National Immunization Survey interview and determined their vaccination status at aged 24 months. Data included parents' reports of delay and/or refusal of vaccine doses, psychosocial factors suggested by the Health Belief Model, and provider-reported up-to-date vaccination status. Results.: In 2009, approximately 60.2% of parents with children aged 24–35 months neither delayed nor refused vaccines, 25.8% only delayed, 8.2% only refused, and 5.8% both delayed and refused vaccines. Compared with parents who neither delayed nor refused vaccines, parents who delayed and refused vaccines were significantly less likely to believe that vaccines are necessary to protect the health of children (70.1% vs. 96.2%), that their child might get a disease if they aren't vaccinated (71.0% vs. 90.0%), and that vaccines are safe (50.4% vs. 84.9%). Children of parents who delayed and refused also had significantly lower vaccination coverage for nine of the 10 recommended childhood vaccines including diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (65.3% vs. 85.2%), polio (76.9% vs. 93.8%), and measles-mumps-rubella (68.4% vs. 92.5%). After adjusting for sociodemographic differences, we found that parents who were less likely to agree that vaccines are necessary to protect the health of children, to believe that their child might get a disease if they aren't vaccinated, or to believe that vaccines are safe had significantly lower coverage for all 10 childhood vaccines. Conclusions.: Parents who delayed and refused vaccine doses were more likely to have vaccine safety concerns and perceive fewer benefits associated with vaccines. Guidelines published by the American Academy of Pediatrics may assist providers in responding to parents who may delay or refuse vaccines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice
(1992) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-116-4-350_1 · Cited by 13,207
The Health Belief Model: a decade later.
Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984) · Health Education Quarterly · doi:10.1177/109019818401100101 · Cited by 8,437
Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General: (525162010-001)
(1995) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e525162010-001 · Cited by 5,479
Health Belief Model and Personal Health Behavior
Becker, M. H. (1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,065
Champion, V. L., & Skinner, C. S. (2008) · Cited by 2,727
Analysis of Complex Survey Samples
Lumley, T. (2004) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v009.i08 · Cited by 2,425
The Health Belief Model and Sick Role Behavior
Becker, M. H. (1974) · Health Education Monographs · doi:10.1177/109019817400200407 · Cited by 2,327
Why People Use Health Services
ROSENSTOCK, I. M. (2005) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00425.x · Cited by 2,325
Why People Use Health Services
Rosenstock, I. M. (1966) · The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3348967 · Cited by 2,305
A Framework for Public Health Action: The Health Impact Pyramid
Frieden, T. R. (2010) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.185652 · Cited by 1,535
Cited by
Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial
Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Richey, S., & Freed, G. L. (2014) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2013-2365 · Cited by 1,300
Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action
Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Rothman, A. J., Leask, J., & Kempe, A. (2017) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100618760521 · Cited by 1,233
Salmon, D. A., Dudley, M. Z., Glanz, J. M., & Omer, S. B. (2015) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.09.035 · Cited by 414
Edwards, K. M., Hackell, J. M., THE COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES, T. C. O. P. A. A. M., Byington, C. L., Maldonado, Y. A., Barnett, E. D., Davies, H. D., Edwards, K. M., Lynfield, R., Munoz, F. M., et al. (2016) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2146 · Cited by 302
“Nature Does Things Well, Why Should We Interfere?”: Vaccine Hesitancy Among Mothers
Dubé, E., Vivion, M., Sauvageau, C., Gagneur, A., Gagnon, R., & Guay, M. (2016) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732315573207 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, P. J., Humiston, S. G., Marcuse, E. K., Zhao, Z., Dorell, C. G., Howes, C., & Hibbs, B.
- Venue
- Public Health Reports®
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 2_suppl
- Pages
- 135-146
- ISSN
- 0033-3549 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2877
- OpenAlex
- W1871342307
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 19.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parental Delay or Refusal of Vaccine Doses, Childhood Vaccination Coverage at 24 Months of Age, and the Health Belief Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/00333549111260s215
- The paper
- Smith, P. J., Humiston, S. G., Marcuse, E. K., Zhao, Z., Dorell, C. G., Howes, C., & Hibbs, B. (2011). Parental Delay or Refusal of Vaccine Doses, Childhood Vaccination Coverage at 24 Months of Age, and the Health Belief Model. Public Health Reports®. https://doi.org/10.1177/00333549111260s215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.