Cited by 10Religious Freedom and DiscriminationPublic Health Policies and EducationVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Respecting Religious Freedoms and Protecting the Public's Health

Open access
Hodge, James G.·2015·Public Health Reports®

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/003335491513000518

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dietary requirements related to religions are heterogeneous, and further variability is due to variations in a single religion depending upon the country of origin.

    “Dietary requirements related to religions are heterogeneous, 711 and further variability is due to variations in a single religion depending upon the country of 712 origin [62].”

    From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [62]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hodge, J. G.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hodge, James G.
Venue
Public Health Reports®
Published
2015-09
Volume
130
Issue
5
Pages
546-549
ISSN
  • 0033-3549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2877
OpenAlex
W2254268233
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 4
FWCI
18.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Religious Freedom and Discrimination
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
religious freedom, religious exemptions, health regulation
MeSH terms
Commerce, Contraceptive Agents, Contraceptive Devices, Health Benefit Plans, Employee, Humans, Human Rights, Public Health, Religion and Medicine, United States, Vaccination, Needle-Exchange Programs, Insurance Coverage, Supreme Court Decisions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review