English Educational Policy for High Schools in Japan: Ideals vs. Reality
Abstract
■ The Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology issues a document known as the Course of Study Guidelines on average once every ten years. This document states the overall and specific goals for English education in Japanese junior and senior high schools including specifying the contents of ministry approved textbooks. This study looks at the influence these guidelines have had on classroom pedagogy from the point of view of the student. For this study 112 college freshmen were surveyed shortly after they had been admitted into several private universities in the Tokyo area, responding to both closed-response and open-response questions about their perceptions of classroom practice in each of the six English courses defined in the guidelines. In the closed-response questionnaire, students were asked to rate various items related to teaching. In the open-response questionnaire, students were asked to describe the teaching practice of their English teachers. Standard descriptive statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data. The study gives insights into the successes and failures of the guideline's curriculum revisions. It is a response to call for the further study by Nunan (2003) and helps to show the complicated gap between educational policies and actual teaching practice in Japan.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Japan, entrance examinations for prestigious universities continue to use traditional forms of assessment based on challenging reading passages, receptive skills through multiple choice items, and translation focusing on vocabulary and grammar.
“In Japan, entrance examinations for prestigious universities continue to use traditional forms of assessment based on challenging reading passages, the testing of receptive skills through multiple choice items, and translation focusing on vocabulary and grammar (Kikuchi and Browne 2009).”
From 'In reality its almost impossible': CLT-oriented curriculum change (2015) · cites this paper as Kikuchi and Browne 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
'In reality its almost impossible': CLT-oriented curriculum change
Humphries, S., & Burns, A. (2015) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccu081 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kikuchi, K., & Browne, C.
- Affiliations
- Tokai University (JP)
- Meiji Gakuin University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Kikuchi, Keita
- Browne, Charles
- Venue
- RELC Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-06-10
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 172-191
- ISSN
- 0033-6882 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-526X
- OpenAlex
- W2140636291
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 25.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- RELC Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
- Keywords
- English language teaching, education policy, Japanese Ministry of Education, secondary school curriculum, classroom pedagogy, student perceptions, first-year students, policy-practice gap, curriculum revision, English textbooks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review