Cited by 129Disability Education and EmploymentRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentDisability Rights and Representation

The Employment Environment: Employer Perspectives, Policies, and Practices Regarding the Employment of Persons With Disabilities

Erickson, William A., von Schrader, Sarah, Bruyère, Susanne M., VanLooy, Sara A.·2014·Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin

Abstract

Employers’ characteristics and their policies and practices are workplace environmental factors with important implications for the hiring and retention of employees with disabilities. To explore these factors, a survey was conducted by Cornell University in 2011 focusing on employer policies and practices related to the employment of people with disabilities. The private employer membership of the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM) was randomly sampled across small, medium, and large employers. In all, 675 SHRM members completed the survey and provided information regarding organizational characteristics; disability-related practices and policies regarding recruitment and hiring, training, accessibility and accommodation, retention and advancement; collection of metrics; and their perception of barriers to the employment and advancement of people with disabilities. Ratings of effectiveness of these practices/policies are examined, as well as the number of policies and practices implemented by organizational size and industry. Comparisons of employer views on employment barriers for persons with disabilities to a previous 1998 Cornell/SHRM study are made.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0034355213509841

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only slightly over half of organizations in a large SHRM survey report providing training to HR staff and supervisors on effective interviewing approaches for candidates with disabilities.

    “only slightly over half of organizations taking part in a large Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) survey report providing training to HR staff and supervisors on effective interviewing approaches for candidates with disabilities (Erickson, von Schrader, Bruyère, & VanLooy, 2014).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 129

Authors
Erickson, W. A., von Schrader, S., Bruyère, S. M., & VanLooy, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Venue
Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin
Published
2013-11-14
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
195-208
ISSN
  • 0034-3552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4853
OpenAlex
W2138619651
Cited by
129
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Education
  • Kessler Foundation
  • Australian Government
  • National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
employment of people with disabilities, work environment, recruitment and retention, disability accommodation, accessibility, employee training, career development, barriers to employment, organizational size, industry differences, employer perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review