The Employment Environment: Employer Perspectives, Policies, and Practices Regarding the Employment of Persons With Disabilities
Abstract
Employers’ characteristics and their policies and practices are workplace environmental factors with important implications for the hiring and retention of employees with disabilities. To explore these factors, a survey was conducted by Cornell University in 2011 focusing on employer policies and practices related to the employment of people with disabilities. The private employer membership of the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM) was randomly sampled across small, medium, and large employers. In all, 675 SHRM members completed the survey and provided information regarding organizational characteristics; disability-related practices and policies regarding recruitment and hiring, training, accessibility and accommodation, retention and advancement; collection of metrics; and their perception of barriers to the employment and advancement of people with disabilities. Ratings of effectiveness of these practices/policies are examined, as well as the number of policies and practices implemented by organizational size and industry. Comparisons of employer views on employment barriers for persons with disabilities to a previous 1998 Cornell/SHRM study are made.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only slightly over half of organizations in a large SHRM survey report providing training to HR staff and supervisors on effective interviewing approaches for candidates with disabilities.
“only slightly over half of organizations taking part in a large Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) survey report providing training to HR staff and supervisors on effective interviewing approaches for candidates with disabilities (Erickson, von Schrader, Bruyère, & VanLooy, 2014).”
From The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Erickson, von Schrader, Bruyère, & VanLooy, 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 26 · Cited by 129
- Authors
- Erickson, W. A., von Schrader, S., Bruyère, S. M., & VanLooy, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
- ORCID
- Bruyère, Susanne M.
- Venue
- Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-11-14
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 195-208
- ISSN
- 0034-3552 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4853
- OpenAlex
- W2138619651
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Education
- Kessler Foundation
- Australian Government
- National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Keywords
- employment of people with disabilities, work environment, recruitment and retention, disability accommodation, accessibility, employee training, career development, barriers to employment, organizational size, industry differences, employer perceptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review