Cited by 5Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Screening and management of gestational diabetes mellitus in Scottish obstetric units: A national survey

Stirrat, Laura I, Denison, Fiona C, Love, Corinne DB, Lindsay, Robert S, Reynolds, Rebecca M·2015·Scottish Medical Journal

Abstract

Background and aims: The last study of screening practices for gestational diabetes (GDM) in the UK concluded that a lack of consensus about screening was due to a lack of clinical guidelines. We aimed to determine current practices in Scotland since new guidelines recommended that diagnosis should be made at a lower level of hyperglycaemia. Method and results: An online questionnaire designed to investigate the screening and management of GDM was distributed to all maternity units in Scotland managing women with GDM ( n = 15) for completion by relevant clinical team members. The response rate was 100%. Considerable variation in clinical practice existed between units. Thirteen units (86.7%) had adopted the lower glucose tolerance values for diagnosis of GDM (fasting ≥5.1 mmol/L; 2-h ≥8.5 mmol/L) recommended by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network in 2010. Available data from units using this guideline ( n = 3) revealed a significant increase in the percentage of women diagnosed with GDM between 2010 and 2012 (2010: 1.28%, 2012: 2.54%; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Despite provision of clinical guidelines, there are still inconsistencies in screening and management of GDM in Scotland. If a similar increase in the prevalence of GDM is experienced across Scotland, there will be major implications for health care provision and resource allocation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0036933014563458

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Scotland, after changing criteria, GDM prevalence increased from 1.28% in 2010 to 2.54% in 2012.

    “After changing the criteria, the GDM prevalence increased from 1.28% in 2010 to 2.54% in 2012 [157].”
  • In Scotland, 2010-2012, AIDPSG/WHO 2013 guidelines were recommended but using only fasting and 2 h blood glucose levels; SIGN recommends same criteria for high-risk patients.

    “Data from Scotland, collected between 2010 and 2012, presented that for this part of the United Kingdon, the AIDPSG/WHO 2013 guidelines to diagnose GDM are recommended, but using only fasting and 2 h blood glucose levels [157]. In addition SIGN recommends the same criteria for diagnosing GDM but in high-risk patients [158].”
  • In Scotland, these criteria were not accepted by all obstetric units, and universal screening was performed only in 20% of them.

    “Additionally, these criteria were not accepted by all obstetric units in Scotland, and universal screening was performed only in 20% of them.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stirrat, L. I., Denison, F. C., Love, C. D., Lindsay, R. S., & Reynolds, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Reynolds, Rebecca M
Venue
Scottish Medical Journal
Published
2014-12-04
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
37-43
ISSN
  • 0036-9330 (ISSN-L)
  • 2045-6441
OpenAlex
W2072645260
Cited by
5
References
2
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scottish Medical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
British Heart Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, GDM screening, glucose tolerance test, clinical practice variation, maternity ward
MeSH terms
Adult, Fasting, Female, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Mass Screening, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Scotland, Prevalence, Diabetes, Gestational, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review