Screening and management of gestational diabetes mellitus in Scottish obstetric units: A national survey
Abstract
Background and aims: The last study of screening practices for gestational diabetes (GDM) in the UK concluded that a lack of consensus about screening was due to a lack of clinical guidelines. We aimed to determine current practices in Scotland since new guidelines recommended that diagnosis should be made at a lower level of hyperglycaemia. Method and results: An online questionnaire designed to investigate the screening and management of GDM was distributed to all maternity units in Scotland managing women with GDM ( n = 15) for completion by relevant clinical team members. The response rate was 100%. Considerable variation in clinical practice existed between units. Thirteen units (86.7%) had adopted the lower glucose tolerance values for diagnosis of GDM (fasting ≥5.1 mmol/L; 2-h ≥8.5 mmol/L) recommended by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network in 2010. Available data from units using this guideline ( n = 3) revealed a significant increase in the percentage of women diagnosed with GDM between 2010 and 2012 (2010: 1.28%, 2012: 2.54%; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Despite provision of clinical guidelines, there are still inconsistencies in screening and management of GDM in Scotland. If a similar increase in the prevalence of GDM is experienced across Scotland, there will be major implications for health care provision and resource allocation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Scotland, after changing criteria, GDM prevalence increased from 1.28% in 2010 to 2.54% in 2012.
“After changing the criteria, the GDM prevalence increased from 1.28% in 2010 to 2.54% in 2012 [157].”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [157]
In Scotland, 2010-2012, AIDPSG/WHO 2013 guidelines were recommended but using only fasting and 2 h blood glucose levels; SIGN recommends same criteria for high-risk patients.
“Data from Scotland, collected between 2010 and 2012, presented that for this part of the United Kingdon, the AIDPSG/WHO 2013 guidelines to diagnose GDM are recommended, but using only fasting and 2 h blood glucose levels [157]. In addition SIGN recommends the same criteria for diagnosing GDM but in high-risk patients [158].”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [157]
In Scotland, these criteria were not accepted by all obstetric units, and universal screening was performed only in 20% of them.
“Additionally, these criteria were not accepted by all obstetric units in Scotland, and universal screening was performed only in 20% of them.”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [157]
Cites
Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes
Rowan, J. A., Hague, W. M., Gao, W., Battin, M. R., & Moore, M. P. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0707193 · Cited by 1,291 · see citing works
Recurrence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Kim, C., Berger, D. K., & Chamany, S. (2007) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc06-2517 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century
Dłuski, D. F., Ruszała, M., Rudziński, G., Pożarowska, K., Brzuszkiewicz, K., & Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192315804 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stirrat, L. I., Denison, F. C., Love, C. D., Lindsay, R. S., & Reynolds, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (GB)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- British Heart Foundation Centre for Cardiovascular Science (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Reynolds, Rebecca M
- Venue
- Scottish Medical Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-12-04
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-43
- ISSN
- 0036-9330 (ISSN-L)
- 2045-6441
- OpenAlex
- W2072645260
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scottish Medical Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- British Heart Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, GDM screening, glucose tolerance test, clinical practice variation, maternity ward
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Fasting, Female, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Mass Screening, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Scotland, Prevalence, Diabetes, Gestational, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Guideline Adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review