The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Policing the beats: The criminalisation of UK drill and grime music by the London Metropolitan Police
Open accessAbstract
As debates on the rise of violent crime in London unfold, UK drill music is routinely accused of encouraging criminal behaviour among young Black Britons from deprived areas of the capital. Following a series of bans against drill music videos and the imposition of Criminal Behaviour Orders and gang injunctions against drill artists, discussions on the defensibility of such measures call for urgent, yet hitherto absent, sociological reflections on a topical issue. This article attempts to fill this gap, by demonstrating how UK drill and earlier Black music genres, like grime, have been criminalised and policed in ways that question the legitimacy of and reveal the discriminatory nature of policing young Black people by the London Metropolitan Police as the coercive arm of the British state. Drawing on the concept of racial neoliberalism, the policing of drill will be approached theoretically as an expression of the discriminatory politics that neoliberal economics facilitates in order to exclude those who the state deems undesirable or undeserving of its protection.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“UK drill music has gripped the popular and penal imagination as a veritable social problem that generates noisy headlines and attracts heavy-handed criminal justice system responses (Fatsis, 2019b; Ilan, 2020; Lynes et al . 2021).”
From Copping the blame: the role of YouTube videos in the criminalisation of UK drill music (2022) · cites this paper as Fatsis, 2019b
In the citing paper
“These videos contribute to and reproduce popular representations of drill music in mainstream news media and criminal justice rhetoric (Fatsis, 2019b: 1301, 1304) as intrinsically associated with street gangs.”
From Copping the blame: the role of YouTube videos in the criminalisation of UK drill music (2022) · cites this paper as Fatsis, 2019b
In the citing paper
“They also provide further justification for the discriminatory suppression of drill by the UK criminal justice system (Quinn, 2018; Fatsis, 2019b; 2021b; Ilan, 2020; Owusu-Bempah, 2020, 2022).”
From Copping the blame: the role of YouTube videos in the criminalisation of UK drill music (2022) · cites this paper as Fatsis, 2019b
In the citing paper
“despite the dearth of evidence to suggest any such link (Fatsis, 2019b: 13035)”
From Copping the blame: the role of YouTube videos in the criminalisation of UK drill music (2022) · cites this paper as Fatsis, 2019b
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 87
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- 10.1177/1367549413491937 · DOI
- 10.1057/9781137313089_3 · DOI
- 10.1080/09615768.2017.1298942 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203069271 · DOI
- Bramwell R., 2017, Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 25, 475, 10.1080/1070289X.2017.1287487 · DOI
- Brennan I. (2018). Weapon-carrying and the reduction of violent harm. The British Journal of Criminology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy032 · DOI
- Charles M., 2016, Hallowed be thy grime? A musicological and sociological genealogy of grime music and its relation to Black Atlantic religious discourse (#HBTG?)
- Charles M., 2016, Blackness in Britain, 80
- 10.1080/13676261.2010.549820 · DOI
- Equality and Human Rights Commission, 2010, Stop and think: A critical review of the use of stop and search powers in England and Wales
- Equality and Human Rights Commission, 2012, Race disproportionality in stops and searches under Section 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994
- Fatsis L. (2018). Grime: Criminal subculture or public counterculture? A critical investigation into the criminalisation of black musical subcultures in the UK. Crime, Media, Culture. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659018784111 · DOI
- Fryer P., 1984, Staying power: The history of black people in Britain
- Gilroy P., 1987, There ain’t no black in the Union Jack
- Gilroy P., 2007, Black Britain: A photographic history
- Goldberg D. T., 2009, The threat of race: Reflections on racial neoliberalism
- Grimshaw R., 2018, Young people, violence and knives: Revisiting the evidence and policy discussions
- Hancox D., 2013, Stand up tall: Dizzee Rascal and the birth of grime
- Hancox D., 2018, Inner city pressure: The story of grime
- 10.1177/1741659011433367 · DOI
- Institute of Race Relations, 1987, Policing against black people
- 10.1057/9781137473813 · DOI
- 10.1080/01419870.2011.629002 · DOI
- Keeling P., 2017, No respect: Young BAME men, the police and stop and search
- Keith M., 1993, Racism, the city and the state, 193
- Kelley R., 1996, Droppin’ science: Critical essays on rap music and hip hop culture, 183
- Klinenberg E., 2018, Palaces for the people: How to build a more equal and united society
- London Metropolitan Police Service, 2008, Promotion Event Risk Assessment Form 696
- London Metropolitan Police Service, 2009, Promotion Event Risk Assessment Form 696
- Macpherson W., 1999, The Stephen Lawrence inquiry
- 10.1080/09627251.2012.671003 · DOI
- 10.1177/0306396818797268 · DOI
- Perera J., 2019, The London clearances: Race, housing and policing
- 10.1108/SC-01-2017-0004 · DOI
- Scarman L. G., 1981, The Scarman report: The Brixton disorders, Cmnd 8427
- 10.1093/bjc/azm024 · DOI
- 10.1080/10286631003695547 · DOI
- Tilly C., 1992, Coercion, capital and European states: AD 990–1992
- 10.1093/bjc/azx085 · DOI
- Ture K., 1967, Black power: The politics of liberation
- Turner P., 2010, Hip hop versus rap’: An ethnography of the cultural politics of new hip hop practices
- 10.4324/9781315544663 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781315638393 · DOI
- White J., 2018, The business of grime
- Whitfield J., 2014, Unhappy dialogue: The Metropolitan Police and London’s West Indian community
- Williams P., 2016, Dangerous associations: Joint enterprise, gangs and racism: An analysis of the processes of criminalisation of Black, Asian and minority ethnic individuals
Metadata
- Authors
- Fatsis, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Southampton (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fatsis, Lambros
- ORCID
- Fatsis, Lambros
- Venue
- The Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-04-05
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1300-1316
- ISSN
- 0038-0261 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-954X
- OpenAlex
- W2928756776
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 15.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- The Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
- University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music History and Culture
- Keywords
- grime music, criminalization, policing, London Metropolitan Police, gang injunctions, racial neoliberalism, Black youth, violent crime, racial discrimination in policing, state coercion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Policing the beats: The criminalisation of UK drill and grime music by the London Metropolitan Police. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0038026119842480
- The paper
- Fatsis, L. (2019). Policing the beats: The criminalisation of UK drill and grime music by the London Metropolitan Police. The Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026119842480