The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
`K is Mentally Ill' the Anatomy of a Factual Account
Abstract
The paper analyses an interview describing how K came to be defined by her friends as mentally ill. The method of analysis assumes that the structure of the conceptual scheme `mental illness' which the reader uses in recognizing `mental illness' is isomorphic with that organizing the text and hence is discoverable `in' it. The full text of the interview is presented as the data. The analysis explicates the interpretation of the text as a method of reading. The text is found to provide instructions for its interpretation and for the authorization of its facticity. K's mental illness is to be located in the collection of instances of K's behaviour which the interview records. How is behaviour to be described as `mentally ill type' behaviour? It is suggested that the interview as a whole organizes a `cutting-out' procedure whereby K's behaviour is presented as making sense neither to her friends nor to the reader of the text. The procedure involves showing for each instance of her behaviour as well as for the collection as a whole that K's behaviour is not properly provided for by relevant social rules or definitions of the situation. To be recognizable as `mentally ill type' behaviour examples of K's actions must be constituted as anomalies rather than as deviations from a norm or rule.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
Cited by
Script Formulations: An Analysis of Event Descriptions in Conversation
Edwards, D. (1994) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x94133001 · Cited by 284
Nettleton, S., Burrows, R., & O'Malley, L. (2005) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00466.x · Cited by 259
Discourse Analysis: Dimensions of Critique in Psychology
Parker, I. (2013) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1080/14780887.2012.741509 · Cited by 104
Pinch, T., & Clark, C. (1986) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038586020002002 · Cited by 73
Individual Agency, the Ordinary, and Postmodern Life
Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (1995) · The Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1995.tb00453.x · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, D. E.
- Venue
- Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1978-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-53
- ISSN
- 0038-0385 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8684
- OpenAlex
- W2113468731
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: `K is Mentally Ill' the Anatomy of a Factual Account. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/003803857801200103
- The paper
- Smith, D. E. (1978). `K is Mentally Ill' the Anatomy of a Factual Account. Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857801200103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.