Decisions, Decisions, Decisions: Using Data to Make Instructional Decisions for Struggling Readers
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Data literacy tends to be low among school personnel.
“Unfortunately, data literacy tends to be low among school personnel, contributing to this limited use of data in decision making [8,9]”
From Using Evidence-Based Practice and Data-Based Decision Making in Inclusive Education (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 34
- Authors
- Filderman, M. J., & Toste, J. R.
- Corresponding author
- Filderman, Marissa J.
- Venue
- TEACHING Exceptional Children
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-12-05
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 130-140
- ISSN
- 0040-0599 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-5684
- OpenAlex
- W2775772137
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Teaching Exceptional Children (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Keywords
- struggling readers, instructional decision-making, data-based instruction, reading intervention, special education, data-driven decision making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
