The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Seeing the street through Instagram. Digital platforms and the amplification of gentrification
Open accessAbstract
As digital platforms are woven into urban life, they become an intrinsic part of the urban experience. Here we examine how representations on digital platforms reflect and shape urban change. Which groups produce and share these representations? What places do they picture? What are their aesthetic registers and norms? And what are the material consequences of these representations? Elaborating on the concept of ‘discursive investing’ introduced by Zukin et al., we address these questions in a case study of Javastraat, a shopping street in a gentrifying neighbourhood in Amsterdam East. On the basis of an analysis of Instagram posts, street observations and interviews, we show that gentrifiers use social media to express their identity status, often creating posts that serve as advertisements for hip and high-class establishments. Meanwhile, other establishments are largely absent from digital platforms, with the notable exception of a number of shops that changed their aesthetics to appeal to gentrifiers. We further show that these uneven representations have material consequences, changing the aesthetics and composition of the shopping street.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 55
- 10.1057/9781137469816_11 · DOI
- 10.1177/1329878X16665177 · DOI
- Anheier HK, 2001, Global Civil Society 2001
- Benkler Y, 2006, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
- Berry JM, 2013, The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility
- Bourdieu P, 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste
- 10.1111/tran.12185 · DOI
- Boy JD, Uitermark J (2020) Lifestyle enclaves in the Instagram city? Social Media & Society. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120940698 (accessed 7 October 2021). · DOI
- 10.1080/02723638.2013.867669 · DOI
- Castells M, 2007, Journal of International Communication, 1, 238
- Castells M, 2012, Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age
- Currid-Halkett E, 2017, The Sum of Small Things. A Theory of the Aspirational Class
- 10.4324/9780203123966 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-49472-2 · DOI
- 10.1177/12063312211001290 · DOI
- 10.1080/00045608.2015.1072791 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00539.x · DOI
- Hagemans I, 2016, Global Cities, Local Streets: Everyday Diversity From New York to Shanghai, 90
- 10.18574/nyu/9781479839216.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Hall C, 2012, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49, 1
- 10.1177/0002764215601714 · DOI
- 10.1080/14036096.2016.1271825 · DOI
- 10.1111/cico.12088 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203358733 · DOI
- 10.1086/518923 · DOI
- 10.1093/oso/9780199381265.001.0001 · DOI
- Leaver T, 2020, Instagram: Visual Social Media Cultures
- 10.1177/0263775819878721 · DOI
- 10.1080/0042098032000136192 · DOI
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262036214.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1535-6841.2004.00092.x · DOI
- Manovich L, 2016, Instagram and Contemporary Image
- 10.1215/08992363-2798379 · DOI
- O’Neil C, 2017, Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy
- 10.1111/cico.12451 · DOI
- 10.1068/a45638 · DOI
- 10.1080/14036090903434975 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781446216880 · DOI · Paper page
- Schoemaker J, 2017, Het Failliet van de Javastraat
- 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.020 · DOI
- Shirky C, 2008, Here Comes Everybody. The Power of Organizing Without Organizations
- Smidt SJ (2015) Gentrificatie in Amsterdam oost. Kwalitatief onderzoek naar de invloed van de gemeente op de rol van horeca in stadsdeel Amsterdam oost. Unpublished BA thesis. Available at: https://scripties.uba.uva.nl/document/612965 (accessed 15 June 2019).
- Smit M, 2016, Het Parool
- Smit M, 2017, Het Parool
- Smith N, 1996, The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City
- Tissot S, 2015, Good Neighbors. Gentrifiying Diversity in Boston’s South End
- 10.1177/0308518X19886321 · DOI
- Tufekci Z, 2017, Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest
- 10.1068/a39142 · DOI
- 10.1177/0042098019897008 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01155.x · DOI
- Zhu L, Lerman K (2016) Attention inequality in social media. ArXiv preprint. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.07200 (accessed 7 October 2021). · arXiv
- Zukin S, 1996, The Cultures of Cities
- 10.1093/oso/9780195382853.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1177/1469540515611203 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Törnberg, P. (2025) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051251323389 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Bronsvoort, I., & Uitermark, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Bronsvoort, Irene
- Venue
- Urban Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-10-28
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2857-2874
- ISSN
- 0042-0980 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-063X
- OpenAlex
- W3211182808
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 12.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Urban Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and sociocultural dynamics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Photography and Visual Culture
- Keywords
- gentrification, Instagram, social media, urban transformation, shopping streets, gentrifiers, identity expression, urban aesthetics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review