Cited by 60Urban Planning and GovernanceUrban and sociocultural dynamicsPhotography and Visual Culture

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Seeing the street through Instagram. Digital platforms and the amplification of gentrification

Open access

Abstract

As digital platforms are woven into urban life, they become an intrinsic part of the urban experience. Here we examine how representations on digital platforms reflect and shape urban change. Which groups produce and share these representations? What places do they picture? What are their aesthetic registers and norms? And what are the material consequences of these representations? Elaborating on the concept of ‘discursive investing’ introduced by Zukin et al., we address these questions in a case study of Javastraat, a shopping street in a gentrifying neighbourhood in Amsterdam East. On the basis of an analysis of Instagram posts, street observations and interviews, we show that gentrifiers use social media to express their identity status, often creating posts that serve as advertisements for hip and high-class establishments. Meanwhile, other establishments are largely absent from digital platforms, with the notable exception of a number of shops that changed their aesthetics to appeal to gentrifiers. We further show that these uneven representations have material consequences, changing the aesthetics and composition of the shopping street.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00420980211046539

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.1057/9781137469816_11 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/1329878X16665177 · DOI
  3. Anheier HK, 2001, Global Civil Society 2001
  4. Benkler Y, 2006, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
  5. Berry JM, 2013, The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility
  6. Bourdieu P, 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste
  7. 10.1111/tran.12185 · DOI
  8. Boy JD, Uitermark J (2020) Lifestyle enclaves in the Instagram city? Social Media & Society. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120940698 (accessed 7 October 2021). · DOI
  9. 10.1080/02723638.2013.867669 · DOI
  10. Castells M, 2007, Journal of International Communication, 1, 238
  11. Castells M, 2012, Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age
  12. Currid-Halkett E, 2017, The Sum of Small Things. A Theory of the Aspirational Class
  13. 10.4324/9780203123966 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/978-3-319-49472-2 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/12063312211001290 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/00045608.2015.1072791 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00539.x · DOI
  18. Hagemans I, 2016, Global Cities, Local Streets: Everyday Diversity From New York to Shanghai, 90
  19. 10.18574/nyu/9781479839216.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Hall C, 2012, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49, 1
  21. 10.1177/0002764215601714 · DOI
  22. 10.1080/14036096.2016.1271825 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/cico.12088 · DOI
  24. 10.4324/9780203358733 · DOI
  25. 10.1086/518923 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/oso/9780199381265.001.0001 · DOI
  27. Leaver T, 2020, Instagram: Visual Social Media Cultures
  28. 10.1177/0263775819878721 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/0042098032000136192 · DOI
  30. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262036214.001.0001 · DOI
  31. 10.1111/j.1535-6841.2004.00092.x · DOI
  32. Manovich L, 2016, Instagram and Contemporary Image
  33. 10.1215/08992363-2798379 · DOI
  34. O’Neil C, 2017, Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy
  35. 10.1111/cico.12451 · DOI
  36. 10.1068/a45638 · DOI
  37. 10.1080/14036090903434975 · DOI
  38. 10.4135/9781446216880 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Schoemaker J, 2017, Het Failliet van de Javastraat
  40. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.020 · DOI
  41. Shirky C, 2008, Here Comes Everybody. The Power of Organizing Without Organizations
  42. Smidt SJ (2015) Gentrificatie in Amsterdam oost. Kwalitatief onderzoek naar de invloed van de gemeente op de rol van horeca in stadsdeel Amsterdam oost. Unpublished BA thesis. Available at: https://scripties.uba.uva.nl/document/612965 (accessed 15 June 2019).
  43. Smit M, 2016, Het Parool
  44. Smit M, 2017, Het Parool
  45. Smith N, 1996, The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City
  46. Tissot S, 2015, Good Neighbors. Gentrifiying Diversity in Boston’s South End
  47. 10.1177/0308518X19886321 · DOI
  48. Tufekci Z, 2017, Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest
  49. 10.1068/a39142 · DOI
  50. 10.1177/0042098019897008 · DOI
  51. 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01155.x · DOI
  52. Zhu L, Lerman K (2016) Attention inequality in social media. ArXiv preprint. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.07200 (accessed 7 October 2021). · arXiv
  53. Zukin S, 1996, The Cultures of Cities
  54. 10.1093/oso/9780195382853.001.0001 · DOI
  55. 10.1177/1469540515611203 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Bronsvoort, I., & Uitermark, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Bronsvoort, Irene
Venue
Urban Studies
Published
2021-10-28
Volume
59
Issue
14
Pages
2857-2874
ISSN
  • 0042-0980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-063X
OpenAlex
W3211182808
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4
FWCI
12.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Urban Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and sociocultural dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Photography and Visual Culture
Keywords
gentrification, Instagram, social media, urban transformation, shopping streets, gentrifiers, identity expression, urban aesthetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review