Animal ethics and tourism: deepening a stimulus–organism–response (S-O-R) framework
Open accessAbstract
Animal ethics has been recognized as an emerging issue in tourism, but limited research has concentrated on tourists’ behaviors toward animal ethics and its fundamental mechanisms. This study develops a research framework to address this gap, including media coverage and organizational strategies on reducing animal abuse, cognitive and affective states toward animal ethics, norm activation model variables, and behavioral intentions using stimulus–organism–response (S-O-R) theory. Findings indicate that media coverage and organizational strategies can be construed as underlying external stimulus constructs within the S-O-R model in the background of animal-related tourism. This study additionally shows the mediating nature of cognitive and affective states. Findings particularly indicate that personal norm is the focal influencing factor of tourists’ behavioral/word-of-mouth intentions toward animal ethics. This research contributes to reducing animal abuse and understanding the underlying theoretical mechanism linked to tourist behaviors and animal ethics.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SOR model is an important framework for understanding the antecedents, interventions and outcomes of tourism activities in environmental psychology.
“SOR model is an important framework for understanding the antecedents, interventions and outcomes of tourism activities in environmental psychology (Choi and Kandampully, 2019; Fakfare et al., 2024).”
From A study on the influence of rural tourism’s perceived destination restorative qualities on loyalty based on SOR model (2025) · cites this paper as Fakfare et al., 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 101 · Cited by 55
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Schacter, D. L., Gilbert, D. T., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Psychology (2nd ed.). Worth.
- Authors
- Fakfare, P., Lee, J.-S., Kim, J. J., Ryu, H. B., & Han, H.
- Affiliations
- Bangkok University (TH)
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- Macau University of Science and Technology (MO)
- Kyungnam University (KR)
- Sejong University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Han, Heesup
- Venue
- Journal of Travel Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2023-05-28
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 940-958
- ISSN
- 0047-2875 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6763
- OpenAlex
- W4378652559
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 101
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 23.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Journal of Travel Research (publishedVersion)
- PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
- Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
- Social Sciences › Demography › Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
- Keywords
- animal ethics, animal cruelty, stimulus-organism-response model, norm activation model, personal norms, media coverage, organizational strategy, behavioral intention, word-of-mouth intention, tourist behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review