Cited by 55Diverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchAnimal Law and WelfareTourism, Volunteerism, and Development

Animal ethics and tourism: deepening a stimulus–organism–response (S-O-R) framework

Open access
Fakfare, Pipatpong, Lee, Jin-Soo, Kim, Jinkyung Jenny, Ryu, Hyungseo Bobby, Han, Heesup·2024·Journal of Travel Research

Abstract

Animal ethics has been recognized as an emerging issue in tourism, but limited research has concentrated on tourists’ behaviors toward animal ethics and its fundamental mechanisms. This study develops a research framework to address this gap, including media coverage and organizational strategies on reducing animal abuse, cognitive and affective states toward animal ethics, norm activation model variables, and behavioral intentions using stimulus–organism–response (S-O-R) theory. Findings indicate that media coverage and organizational strategies can be construed as underlying external stimulus constructs within the S-O-R model in the background of animal-related tourism. This study additionally shows the mediating nature of cognitive and affective states. Findings particularly indicate that personal norm is the focal influencing factor of tourists’ behavioral/word-of-mouth intentions toward animal ethics. This research contributes to reducing animal abuse and understanding the underlying theoretical mechanism linked to tourist behaviors and animal ethics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00472875231175079

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 101 · Cited by 55

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Schacter, D. L., Gilbert, D. T., & Wegner, D. M. (2011). Psychology (2nd ed.). Worth.

Authors
Fakfare, P., Lee, J.-S., Kim, J. J., Ryu, H. B., & Han, H.
Affiliations
  • Bangkok University (TH)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Macau University of Science and Technology (MO)
  • Kyungnam University (KR)
  • Sejong University (KR)
Corresponding author
Han, Heesup
Venue
Journal of Travel Research
Published
2023-05-28
Volume
63
Issue
4
Pages
940-958
ISSN
  • 0047-2875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6763
OpenAlex
W4378652559
Cited by
55
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3
FWCI
23.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Travel Research (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Social Sciences › Law › Animal Law and Welfare
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
Keywords
animal ethics, animal cruelty, stimulus-organism-response model, norm activation model, personal norms, media coverage, organizational strategy, behavioral intention, word-of-mouth intention, tourist behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review