The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Envisioning the common historical and cultural past, gender concerns and conflict management and social tensions: An analysis of upper primary textbooks of social studies of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal
Abstract
The present paper is based on the analysis of social studies’ textbooks of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal. Textbooks of Classes 6 to 8 have been examined from the perspective of envisioning the common cultural and historical past, gender issues and finally conflict management and social tensions. Since all three countries are members of SAARC it becomes equally important to know how they portray the common historical past in their books so that they help children at their formative stage of development to have a correct image of their neighbouring countries, societies and gender issues and also the manner in which they deal with conflicting problems and social tensions in this region. Also, in the long run they should enable children of these countries to internalise the need to cooperate and collaborate amongst themselves for translating the four pillars of education into practice, namely learning to live together, learning to know, learning to do and learning to be.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“and in line with evidence presented in earlier studies using textbook content analysis [87].”
From Gender stereotypes and education: A comparative content analysis of Malaysian, Indonesian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi school textbooks (2018) · cites this paper as [87]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Aslam, Mian Muhammad, 2003, Social Studies Class 6
- Bokhart, M.H., 2003, Social Studies Class 7
- Shamim. Ibrahim, 2003, Social Studies for Class 8
- Chowdhury, Moajjem Hussain, 2003, Social Science Textbook for Class 6
- Chowdhury, Moajjem Hussain, 2003, Social Science Textbook for Class 7
- Chowdhury, Moajjem Hussain, 2003, Social Science Textbook for Class 8
- Ghimire, Diswambhar, 2004, Our Social Studies : Grade 6
- Ghimire, Diswambhar, 2004, Our Social Studies : Grade 8
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Islam, K. M. M., & Asadullah, M. N. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190807 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Srivastava, G.
- Affiliations
- National Council Of Educational Research And Training (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Srivastava, Gouri
- Venue
- Social Change
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 83-97
- ISSN
- 0049-0857 (ISSN-L)
- 0976-3538
- OpenAlex
- W2163250318
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Change (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peace and Human Rights Education
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Multicultural Education and Local Wisdom
- Keywords
- social studies textbooks, upper primary education, cultural identity, gender and education, conflict management, social tensions, SAARC, South Asian regional cooperation, learning to live together, curriculum evaluation, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review