Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Linear Models with Spatially Distributed Data: Spatial Disturbances or Spatial Effects?

Doreian, Patrick·1980·Sociological Methods & Research

Abstract

This article deals with linear models for which data have been aggregated over well-defined geographic areas. Such data may be generated by spatial processes, and these may be represented in the form of spatial autocorrelation in the disturbance term or directly in the form of a spatial effect. This article details the derivation of Ord's (1975) MLEprocedurefor the spatial disturbances model and contrasts it with this MLE procedure for the spatial effects model. These alternative model specifications and estimation procedures are then illustrated by a variety of examples. These MLEprocedures for the spatial models are also contrasted with conventional regression procedures (which ignored geographical space). If there is spatial autocorrelation present, an MLE procedure is preferable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/004912418000900102

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Doreian, P.
Venue
Sociological Methods & Research
Published
1980-08
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
29-60
ISSN
  • 0049-1241 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8294
OpenAlex
W2106631101
Cited by
284
References
0
FWCI
14.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linear Models with Spatially Distributed Data: Spatial Disturbances or Spatial Effects? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/004912418000900102
The paper
Doreian, P. (1980). Linear Models with Spatially Distributed Data: Spatial Disturbances or Spatial Effects? Sociological Methods & Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912418000900102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.