The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Democracy as Reflexive Cooperation: John Dewey and the Theory of Democracy Today
Abstract
Au-dela de l'opposition entre le republicanisme et le proceduralisme comme reponses au liberalisme politique, l'A. montre que la theorie de la democratie developpee par Dewey constitue une troisieme voie dans le debat actuel sur les modeles democratiques, proposant une synthese des deux positions fondee sur la combinaison des procedures reflexives et de la communaute politique au sein de la sphere de la cooperation sociale. Examinant les notions hegeliennes et marxistes d'auto-administration et de division du travail, ainsi que la conception proceduraliste de la sphere publique, l'A. montre que la position de Dewey constitue une reponse pertinente a la theorie discursive de la democratie chez Habermas
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The revival of democratic public spheres in which the social problems of the United States should be discussed and a solution provided requires anchoring in a prepolitical association of all citizens (Honneth 1998).”
From Gifts of Cooperation, Mauss and Pragmatism (2016) · cites this paper as Honneth 1998
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gifts of Cooperation, Mauss and Pragmatism
Adloff, F. (2016) · Routledge · doi:10.4324/9781315692982 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- HONNETH, A.
- Affiliations
- Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
- Corresponding author
- HONNETH, AXEL
- ORCID
- HONNETH, AXEL
- Venue
- Political Theory
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 763-783
- ISSN
- 0090-5917 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7476
- OpenAlex
- W2010362216
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 16.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Political Theory (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Theory and Philosophy
- Keywords
- democracy, John Dewey, republicanism, proceduralism, political community, social cooperation, self-administration, division of labor, Hegel, Karl Marx, public sphere, discursive democracy, Jürgen Habermas, critique of liberalism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
